International orthodontics · 2022
Rate of upper incisor retraction in Class II division 1 patients managed with palatal versus buccal miniscrew supported segmental orthodontics: Randomized parallel clinical trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zaher Ghadir Ragheb, Hafez Ahmed Mohamed, El-Bialy Ahmed Abd-Kader
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare maxillary incisor retraction rates using buccal orthodontics with segmented arch approach supported by a buccal or palatal mini-screw in non-growing Class II Division 1 patients during a 3-month period.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients between September 2018 and December 2021 with following criteria were included: non-growing class II division 1 protrusion, indication for premolar extraction, no or little crowding, normal overbite, no previous orthodontic treatment, no systematic disease, good oral hygiene, no periodontal problems or oral habits. Mini-implant was inserted buccally or palatally between upper second premolar and first molar bilaterally. Incisor retraction was manipulated by a 200-gram force through a nickel-titanium closed-coil spring extended from the mini-implant to the segmental design. Study casts were made before retraction and after every 4 weeks (T0: baseline, T1: 4 weeks, T2, 8 weeks, T3: 12 weeks). A repeated measures ANOVA was performed for total comparison of data (mm of retraction) on 3D casts. A pairwise t test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison between two experimental periods for the same group. An independent samples t-test was also used for comparison between two groups for the same experimental period.
RESULTS: Of 30 patients meeting the eligibility criteria, only 28 were included with mean age 16±2.5 years. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in incisor retraction between the time intervals for both buccal and palatal groups (P=0.001). In addition, the paired-sample t test indicated a significant difference between each time interval for both the buccal and palatal groups (P=0.001), except between T3 and T2 for the palatal group (P=0.09). The independent sample t-test revealed significant differences between the buccal and palatal groups at T1 (Mean: 0.55 [0.355-0.748],=0.001) and T2 (Mean: 1.4 [0.91-1.88], P=0.001); whereas no significant difference was found at T3 (Mean: 1.15 [0.67-1.63], P=0.945).
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior retraction using a segmental palatal model with mini-screws was effective regardless of the buccal or palatal situation of the minivis. Retraction of incisors with palatal miniscrews was significantly faster in the first two months.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients between September 2018 and December 2021 with following criteria were included: non-growing class II division 1 protrusion, indication for premolar extraction, no or little crowding, normal overbite, no previous orthodontic treatment, no systematic disease, good oral hygiene, no periodontal problems or oral habits. Mini-implant was inserted buccally or palatally between upper second premolar and first molar bilaterally. Incisor retraction was manipulated by a 200-gram force through a nickel-titanium closed-coil spring extended from the mini-implant to the segmental design. Study casts were made before retraction and after every 4 weeks (T0: baseline, T1: 4 weeks, T2, 8 weeks, T3: 12 weeks). A repeated measures ANOVA was performed for total comparison of data (mm of retraction) on 3D casts. A pairwise t test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison between two experimental periods for the same group. An independent samples t-test was also used for comparison between two groups for the same experimental period.
RESULTS: Of 30 patients meeting the eligibility criteria, only 28 were included with mean age 16±2.5 years. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in incisor retraction between the time intervals for both buccal and palatal groups (P=0.001). In addition, the paired-sample t test indicated a significant difference between each time interval for both the buccal and palatal groups (P=0.001), except between T3 and T2 for the palatal group (P=0.09). The independent sample t-test revealed significant differences between the buccal and palatal groups at T1 (Mean: 0.55 [0.355-0.748],=0.001) and T2 (Mean: 1.4 [0.91-1.88], P=0.001); whereas no significant difference was found at T3 (Mean: 1.15 [0.67-1.63], P=0.945).
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior retraction using a segmental palatal model with mini-screws was effective regardless of the buccal or palatal situation of the minivis. Retraction of incisors with palatal miniscrews was significantly faster in the first two months.