MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7326/m18-1795

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of internal medicine · 2019

Hospital Readmission Rates in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis.

Panagiotou Orestis A, Kumar Amit, Gutman Roee, Keohane Laura M, Rivera-Hernandez Maricruz, Rahman Momotazur, Gozalo Pedro L, Mor Vincent, Trivedi Amal N

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program reports risk-standardized readmission rates for traditional Medicare but not Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE

To compare readmission rates between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study linking the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) file with the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS).

SETTING

4748 U.S. acute care hospitals.

PATIENTS: Patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n = 841 613), congestive heart failure (CHF) (n = 1 458 652), or pneumonia (n = 2 020 365) between 2011 and 2014.

MEASUREMENTS: 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

Among admissions for AMI, CHF, and pneumonia identified in MedPAR, 29.2%, 38.0%, and 37.2%, respectively, did not have a corresponding record in HEDIS. Of these, 18.9% for AMI, 23.7% for CHF, and 18.3% for pneumonia resulted in a readmission that was identified in MedPAR. However, among index admissions appearing in HEDIS, 14.4% for AMI, 18.4% for CHF, and 13.9% for pneumonia resulted in a readmission. Patients in Medicare Advantage had lower unadjusted readmission rates than those in traditional Medicare for all 3 conditions (16.6% vs. 17.1% for AMI, 21.4% vs. 21.7% for CHF, and 16.3% vs. 16.4% for pneumonia). However, after standardization, patients in Medicare Advantage had higher readmission rates than patients in traditional Medicare for AMI (17.2% vs. 16.9%; difference, 0.3 percentage point [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.5 percentage point]), CHF (21.7% vs. 21.4%; difference, 0.3 percentage point [CI, 0.2 to 0.5 percentage point]), and pneumonia (16.5% vs. 16.0%; difference, 0.5 percentage point [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.6 percentage point]). Rate differences increased between 2011 and 2014.

LIMITATION: Potential unobserved differences between populations.

CONCLUSION

The HEDIS data underreported hospital admissions for 3 common medical conditions, and readmission rates were higher among patients with underreported admissions. Medicare Advantage beneficiaries had higher risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates than traditional Medicare beneficiaries.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.

Для цитирования: Panagiotou Orestis A, Kumar Amit, Gutman Roee, Keohane Laura M, Rivera-Hernandez Maricruz, Rahman Momotazur, Gozalo Pedro L, Mor Vincent, Trivedi Amal N. Hospital Readmission Rates in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis.. Annals of internal medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.7326/m18-1795.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.