MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi · 2017

[Reliability and validity of Driving Anger Scale in professional drivers in China].

Li Z, Yang Y M, Zhang C, Li Y, Hu J, Gao L W, Zhou Y X, Zhang X J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Driving Anger Scale (DAS) in professional drivers in China and provide a scientific basis for the application of the scale in drivers in China.

Methods

Professional drivers, including taxi drivers, bus drivers, truck drivers and school bus drivers, were selected to complete the questionnaire. Cronbach's α and split-half reliability were calculated to evaluate the reliability of DAS, and content, contract, discriminant and convergent validity were performed to measure the validity of the scale.

Results

The overall Cronbach's α of DAS was 0.934 and the split-half reliability was 0.874. The correlation coefficient of each subscale with the total scale was 0.639-0.922. The simplified version of DAS supported a presupposed six-factor structure, explaining 56.371% of the total variance revealed by exploratory factor analysis. The DAS had good convergent and discriminant validity, with the success rate of calibration experiment of 100%.

Conclusion

DAS has a good reliability and validity in professional drivers in China, and the use of DAS is worth promoting in divers.

Для цитирования: Li Z, Yang Y M, Zhang C, Li Y, Hu J, Gao L W, Zhou Y X, Zhang X J. [Reliability and validity of Driving Anger Scale in professional drivers in China].. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi. 2017. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.11.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.