Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2024
A Novel Score Based on Controlled Attenuation Parameter Accurately Predicts Hepatic Steatosis in Individuals With Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Derivation and Independent Validation Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
An Zi-Ming, Liu Qiao-Hong, Ye Xin-Jian, Zhang Qian, Pei Hua-Fu, Xin Xin, Yuan Jie, Huang Qian, Liu Kun, Lu Fang, Yan Zhi-Han, Zhao Yu, Hu Yi-Yang, Zheng Ming-Hua, Feng Qin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, the diagnostic efficacy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) was not very accurate in evaluating liver fat content. The aim of this study was to develop a score, based on CAP and conventional clinical parameters, to improve the diagnostic performance of CAP regarding liver fat content.
METHODS: A total of 373 participants from 2 independent Chinese cohorts were included and divided into derivation (n = 191), internal validation (n = 75), and external validation (n = 107) cohorts. Based on the significant difference index between the 2 groups defined by the magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) in derivation cohort, the optimal model (CAP-BMI-AST score [CBST]) was screened by the number of parameters and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In the internal and external validation cohorts, the AUROC and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of CBST with that of CAP.
RESULTS: We constructed the CBST = -14.27962 + 0.05431 × CAP - 0.14266 × body mass index + 0.01715 × aspartate aminotransferase. When MRI-PDFF was ≥20%, ≥10%, and ≥5%, the AUROC for CBST was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83), 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98), which was higher than that for CAP respectively. In the internal validation cohort, the AUROC for CBST was 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90), 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-1.00), and 0.98 (95% CI 0.94-1.00). The optimal thresholds of CBST were -0.5345, -1.7404, and -1.9959 for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥20%, ≥10%, and ≥5%, respectively.
DISCUSSION: The CBST score can accurately evaluate liver steatosis and is superior to the CAP.
METHODS: A total of 373 participants from 2 independent Chinese cohorts were included and divided into derivation (n = 191), internal validation (n = 75), and external validation (n = 107) cohorts. Based on the significant difference index between the 2 groups defined by the magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) in derivation cohort, the optimal model (CAP-BMI-AST score [CBST]) was screened by the number of parameters and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In the internal and external validation cohorts, the AUROC and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of CBST with that of CAP.
RESULTS: We constructed the CBST = -14.27962 + 0.05431 × CAP - 0.14266 × body mass index + 0.01715 × aspartate aminotransferase. When MRI-PDFF was ≥20%, ≥10%, and ≥5%, the AUROC for CBST was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83), 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98), which was higher than that for CAP respectively. In the internal validation cohort, the AUROC for CBST was 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90), 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-1.00), and 0.98 (95% CI 0.94-1.00). The optimal thresholds of CBST were -0.5345, -1.7404, and -1.9959 for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥20%, ≥10%, and ≥5%, respectively.
DISCUSSION: The CBST score can accurately evaluate liver steatosis and is superior to the CAP.