Heart rhythm · 2017
Predictors of ventricular arrhythmia after left ventricular assist device implantation: A large single-center observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Efimova Elena, Fischer Julia, Bertagnolli Livio, Dinov Borislav, Kircher Simon, Rolf Sascha, Sommer Philipp, Bollmann Andreas, Richter Sergio, Meyer Anna, Garbade Jens, Hindricks Gerhard, Arya Arash
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of VAs and their impact on mortality in LVAD patients.
METHODS: A total of 98 consecutive patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (86 [88%] male, mean age 57 ± 10 years), 57 [58%] with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy) who had received an LVAD between May 2011 and December 2013 at our institution were included in the study.
RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were 20% ± 8% and 73 ± 11 mm, respectively. Seventy-three patients (75%) had atrial fibrillation (AF). During the 12 months before LVAD implantation, 38 patients (39%) had experienced ≥1 episode of VAs (11.5 ± 20) requiring ICD therapies. The number of patients with VAs was comparable among all types of ICDs (P = .48). During the 12-month follow-up after LVAD implantation, 48 patients (49%) experienced ≥1 episode of VAs (30 ± 98) with appropriate ICD therapies. The prevalence of VAs was significantly higher among patients with pre-LVAD VAs compared to those without VAs during the year before LVAD implantation (66% vs 38%; P = .008). In a binary multiple logistic regression analysis, pre-LVAD VAs (hazard ratio 5.36, 95% confidence interval 2.0-14.3; P = .001) and AF (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-11.9; P = .024) predicted post-LVAD VAs.
CONCLUSION: Pre-LVAD VAs and AF predict the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation. According to the latest data on the negative impact of post-LVAD VAs on all-cause mortality, further studies should clarify the reasonability of maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF and/or prophylactic catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias before LVAD implantation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of VAs and their impact on mortality in LVAD patients.
METHODS: A total of 98 consecutive patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (86 [88%] male, mean age 57 ± 10 years), 57 [58%] with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy) who had received an LVAD between May 2011 and December 2013 at our institution were included in the study.
RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were 20% ± 8% and 73 ± 11 mm, respectively. Seventy-three patients (75%) had atrial fibrillation (AF). During the 12 months before LVAD implantation, 38 patients (39%) had experienced ≥1 episode of VAs (11.5 ± 20) requiring ICD therapies. The number of patients with VAs was comparable among all types of ICDs (P = .48). During the 12-month follow-up after LVAD implantation, 48 patients (49%) experienced ≥1 episode of VAs (30 ± 98) with appropriate ICD therapies. The prevalence of VAs was significantly higher among patients with pre-LVAD VAs compared to those without VAs during the year before LVAD implantation (66% vs 38%; P = .008). In a binary multiple logistic regression analysis, pre-LVAD VAs (hazard ratio 5.36, 95% confidence interval 2.0-14.3; P = .001) and AF (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-11.9; P = .024) predicted post-LVAD VAs.
CONCLUSION: Pre-LVAD VAs and AF predict the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation. According to the latest data on the negative impact of post-LVAD VAs on all-cause mortality, further studies should clarify the reasonability of maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF and/or prophylactic catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias before LVAD implantation.