Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2022
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early oral cancers: are we ready for it yet? Results from a survey among Indian surgeons treating oral cancers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malik Akshat, Dhar Harsh, Vaidya Abhishek, Fatehi Khuzema, Mair Manish, Chidambaranathan Nithyanand, Thiagarajan Shivakumar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Emerging evidence has shown that sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an oncologically safe option in patients with early oral cancer compared with elective neck dissection (END). However, its use on a routine basis could be associated with many challenges.
STUDY DESIGN: This online survey was conducted among the Indian surgeons treating patients with oral cancer to understand and comprehend the incidence and patterns of usage of SNB in their practice, their approach toward the use of SNB, and the possible challenges they face or perceive in its routine use in patients with early oral cancer.
RESULTS: We received 352 responses with a response rate of 47.63%. Most of the respondents (82.6%) were managing N-zero necks with END, only 15.1% (n = 53) respondents practiced SNB currently. Most respondents believed that SNB offered the advantage of better shoulder function compared with END (76.4% [n = 269]). The deterrents considered for routine use of SNB in early oral cancer were additional costs (71.9% [n = 253]), the unavailability of necessary expertise and infrastructure (87.2% [n = 307]), SLNB being a more time-consuming treatment (58.8% [n = 207]), a higher false negative rate (74.1% [n = 261]), and the possible need of a second surgery (82.4% [n = 290]).
CONCLUSIONS: Though SNB presently could be considered as an alternative treatment option, there seem to be various issues that need to be addressed before it can be adopted as a standard of care across centers.
STUDY DESIGN: This online survey was conducted among the Indian surgeons treating patients with oral cancer to understand and comprehend the incidence and patterns of usage of SNB in their practice, their approach toward the use of SNB, and the possible challenges they face or perceive in its routine use in patients with early oral cancer.
RESULTS: We received 352 responses with a response rate of 47.63%. Most of the respondents (82.6%) were managing N-zero necks with END, only 15.1% (n = 53) respondents practiced SNB currently. Most respondents believed that SNB offered the advantage of better shoulder function compared with END (76.4% [n = 269]). The deterrents considered for routine use of SNB in early oral cancer were additional costs (71.9% [n = 253]), the unavailability of necessary expertise and infrastructure (87.2% [n = 307]), SLNB being a more time-consuming treatment (58.8% [n = 207]), a higher false negative rate (74.1% [n = 261]), and the possible need of a second surgery (82.4% [n = 290]).
CONCLUSIONS: Though SNB presently could be considered as an alternative treatment option, there seem to be various issues that need to be addressed before it can be adopted as a standard of care across centers.