MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27194

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2022

Development of the remote 100 ml water swallow test versus clinical assessment in patients with head and neck cancer: Do they agree?

Watson Laura-Jayne, Woodman Sarah H, Ganderton Deborah, Hutcheson Katherine A, Pringle Shirley, Patterson Joanne M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The 100 ml water swallow test (WST) is a validated swallow assessment used in head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to determine the level of agreement when completing the 100 ml WST via clinician-graded video-testing or patient self-testing compared to standard face-to-face assessment (FTF).

METHODS

Convenience sampling from four UK centers.

INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with HNC treated with any modality prior to, or within 5 years of treatment. Participants were recruited to complete the 100 ml WST by video-testing or self-testing and compared with FTF.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were recruited; 1 was unable to perform the task; 30 in video-testing; and 32 in self-testing. There was no difference in swallow capacity (p = 0.424) and volume (p = 0.363) for the video-testing or the self-testing swallow capacity (p = 0.777) and volume (p = 0.445).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that video-testing and self-testing are reliable methods of completing the 100 ml WST for this sample of patients with HNC.

Для цитирования: Watson Laura-Jayne, Woodman Sarah H, Ganderton Deborah, Hutcheson Katherine A, Pringle Shirley, Patterson Joanne M. Development of the remote 100 ml water swallow test versus clinical assessment in patients with head and neck cancer: Do they agree?. Head & neck. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27194.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.