Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2011
Reference ranges for the fetal cardiac circumference derived by cardio-spatiotemporal image correlation from 14 to 40 weeks' gestation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Traisrisilp Kuntharee, Tongprasert Fuanglada, Srisupundit Kasemsri, Luewan Suchaya, Tongsong Theera
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to construct reference ranges for the fetal cardiac circumference derived from volume data sets obtained by cardio-spatiotemporal image correlation.
METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on normal singleton pregnancies with certain dates from 14 to 40 weeks' gestation. All underwent cardio-spatiotemporal image correlation to acquire volume data sets for subsequent analysis. Cardiac circumferences were measured offline in a multiplanar view with 4-dimensional imaging software. The reference ranges were constructed against gestational weeks and the biparietal diameter as independent variables, using regression models for both the mean and SD.
RESULTS: A total of 678 satisfactory volumes were analyzed. Normal reference ranges for predicting means and SDs of the fetal cardiac circumference were established based on best-fitted equations. The mean cardiac circumference (millimeters) was modeled as a function of gestational age (weeks) and biparietal diameter (centimeters) as follows: cardiac circumference = -53.11 + 6.56 × gestational age - 0.035 × gestational age(2) (SD = 0.67 + 0.18 × gestational age) and -17.60 + 17.68 × biparietal diameter (SD = 1.651 + 0.61 × biparietal diameter). Equations for z score calculation were also provided, and percentile charts for predicting the cardiac circumference at various points of gestational age and biparietal diameter were constructed.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal reference ranges and z scores for the fetal cardiac circumference have been provided. These normative data may be useful tools for assessment of fetal cardiac size, especially in cardiomegaly due to fetal anemia.
METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on normal singleton pregnancies with certain dates from 14 to 40 weeks' gestation. All underwent cardio-spatiotemporal image correlation to acquire volume data sets for subsequent analysis. Cardiac circumferences were measured offline in a multiplanar view with 4-dimensional imaging software. The reference ranges were constructed against gestational weeks and the biparietal diameter as independent variables, using regression models for both the mean and SD.
RESULTS: A total of 678 satisfactory volumes were analyzed. Normal reference ranges for predicting means and SDs of the fetal cardiac circumference were established based on best-fitted equations. The mean cardiac circumference (millimeters) was modeled as a function of gestational age (weeks) and biparietal diameter (centimeters) as follows: cardiac circumference = -53.11 + 6.56 × gestational age - 0.035 × gestational age(2) (SD = 0.67 + 0.18 × gestational age) and -17.60 + 17.68 × biparietal diameter (SD = 1.651 + 0.61 × biparietal diameter). Equations for z score calculation were also provided, and percentile charts for predicting the cardiac circumference at various points of gestational age and biparietal diameter were constructed.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal reference ranges and z scores for the fetal cardiac circumference have been provided. These normative data may be useful tools for assessment of fetal cardiac size, especially in cardiomegaly due to fetal anemia.