Molecular biology reports · 2022
Unravelling of the comparative Transcriptomic Profile of Gallbladder Cancer using mRNA sequencing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dixit Ruhi, Pandey Manoj, Rajput Monika, Shukla Vijay Kumar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) represents a wide geographical diversity as well as heterogeneity in clinical and genomic landscape. There seems to be little progress in the development of diagnostic biomarkers, targeted therapies or individualized approaches to GBC management. In this study, we investigated the whole transcriptome profile of GBC patients using RNA sequencing and identified key genes and pathways associated with gallbladder cancer using bioinformatics.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 10 cases of GBC were collected and sequenced. The raw reads of the gallbladder sample was compared with the gallbladder normal control (SRA Database ID: ERX288537: HPA RNA-seq normal tissues gallbladder). Using Gene ontology analysis the differentially expressed genes were categorized into the biological pathway, cellular component, and molecular function. Pathway enrichment analyses, protein-protein interaction, transcription factor and miRNA interaction that regulate the expression of hub genes were conducted using bioinformatics tool.
RESULTS: A total of 954 differentially expressed mRNA transcripts were identified, including overexpression of REG4, TMEM238, S100A2, LYPD2, and KRT17, as well as underexpressed genes like CCKAR, IGSF10, CHRM2, CRISP3, and FGF19. Enrichment analysis showed the metabolic pathways to be the top five cancer pathways in gallbladder carcinogenesis besides PI3k-Akt signalling pathway, cAMP signalling pathway, miRNAs in cancer, and cell adhesion profile of GBC.
CONCLUSIONS: CCKAR, CDKN2A and LRRK2 were found to be most involved genes in its progression and development through different regulatory pathways. Further, most of the genes were significantly involved in PI3k-Akt, Wnt and hedgehog signaling pathways which have a key role in gallbladder cancer development.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 10 cases of GBC were collected and sequenced. The raw reads of the gallbladder sample was compared with the gallbladder normal control (SRA Database ID: ERX288537: HPA RNA-seq normal tissues gallbladder). Using Gene ontology analysis the differentially expressed genes were categorized into the biological pathway, cellular component, and molecular function. Pathway enrichment analyses, protein-protein interaction, transcription factor and miRNA interaction that regulate the expression of hub genes were conducted using bioinformatics tool.
RESULTS: A total of 954 differentially expressed mRNA transcripts were identified, including overexpression of REG4, TMEM238, S100A2, LYPD2, and KRT17, as well as underexpressed genes like CCKAR, IGSF10, CHRM2, CRISP3, and FGF19. Enrichment analysis showed the metabolic pathways to be the top five cancer pathways in gallbladder carcinogenesis besides PI3k-Akt signalling pathway, cAMP signalling pathway, miRNAs in cancer, and cell adhesion profile of GBC.
CONCLUSIONS: CCKAR, CDKN2A and LRRK2 were found to be most involved genes in its progression and development through different regulatory pathways. Further, most of the genes were significantly involved in PI3k-Akt, Wnt and hedgehog signaling pathways which have a key role in gallbladder cancer development.