Spinal cord · 2025
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soluk Özdemir Yelda, Medin Ceylan Cansın, Paker Nurdan, Korkut Veysel, Kütük Burak, Öneş Kadriye, Buğdaycı Derya, Kesiktaş Fatma N
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional validation study.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to create a Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR) scale and verify its validity and reliability.
SETTING: Rehabilitation Department at Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Training Research Hospital.
METHODS: The Turkish version of SCIM-SR was translated from English using forward and backward translation in accordance with standard guidelines and 90 participants completed the SCIM-SR Turkish form. At the same time, a Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) was administered to the participants by a health professional through observation. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency and concurrent validity.
RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the total scale was 0.883. For the subscales, it was 0.929 for self-care, 0.571 for respiration and sphincter management and 0.885 for mobility. Test-retest reliability after two weeks yielded Spearman coefficients above 0.92 for the total scale and all subscales. When analyzing the correlation between SCIM-SR and SCIM III, the intraclass correlation average and its lower and upper bound values were as follows: 0.984 (0.976-0.990) for self-care; 0.970 (0.955-0.980) for respiration and sphincter management; 0.968 (0.951-0.979) for mobility and 0.980 (0.969-0.987) for the total. There was good agreement between SCIM-SR and SCIM III when evaluating the total score in Bland-Altman graphs. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (0.76; 95% CI [-21.34, 22.87]), but a significant fixed bias was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of SCIM-SR demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good validity in Turkish individuals with spinal cord injury.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to create a Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR) scale and verify its validity and reliability.
SETTING: Rehabilitation Department at Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Training Research Hospital.
METHODS: The Turkish version of SCIM-SR was translated from English using forward and backward translation in accordance with standard guidelines and 90 participants completed the SCIM-SR Turkish form. At the same time, a Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) was administered to the participants by a health professional through observation. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency and concurrent validity.
RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the total scale was 0.883. For the subscales, it was 0.929 for self-care, 0.571 for respiration and sphincter management and 0.885 for mobility. Test-retest reliability after two weeks yielded Spearman coefficients above 0.92 for the total scale and all subscales. When analyzing the correlation between SCIM-SR and SCIM III, the intraclass correlation average and its lower and upper bound values were as follows: 0.984 (0.976-0.990) for self-care; 0.970 (0.955-0.980) for respiration and sphincter management; 0.968 (0.951-0.979) for mobility and 0.980 (0.969-0.987) for the total. There was good agreement between SCIM-SR and SCIM III when evaluating the total score in Bland-Altman graphs. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (0.76; 95% CI [-21.34, 22.87]), but a significant fixed bias was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of SCIM-SR demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good validity in Turkish individuals with spinal cord injury.