European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2011
Off-pump coronary artery bypass and avoidance of hypothermic cardiac arrest improves early left ventricular function in patients with systolic dysfunction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Letsou George V, Wu Ying Xing, Grunkemeier Gary, Rampurwala Murtuza M, Kaiser Larry, Salaskar Abhijit L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) and beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (BH-CAB) performed with cardiopulmonary bypass support are used with increasing frequency in the treatment of coronary artery occlusive disease. The utility of OPCAB and BH-CAB in treating high-risk patients has been studied, but the effects of these procedures on ventricular function have not been thoroughly investigated.
METHODS: Data were collected from a database encompassing all patients who underwent isolated coronary revascularization performed by a single surgeon between August 2002 and March 2007. All procedures (n = 507) began as OPCAB operations, but 99 were converted to BH-CAB during surgery. Each patient's ejection fraction (EF) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively (median, 5.0 days after surgery).
RESULTS: We found that although the BH-CAB patients tended to be in worse health and to have a lower preoperative EF than the OPCAB patients, both groups of patients had similar improvements in postoperative EF (6.8% vs 5.4%; p = 0.65). In addition, multivariable linear regression showed that a lower preoperative EF, age ≥ 70 years, and cardiomegaly predicted less postoperative EF improvement after coronary revascularization by either OPCAB or BH-CAB.
CONCLUSIONS: Both OPCAB and BH-CAB procedures produce significant and similar short-term improvement in EF in patients with coronary disease. This change in EF may account for the subjective clinical improvements seen early after both procedures.
METHODS: Data were collected from a database encompassing all patients who underwent isolated coronary revascularization performed by a single surgeon between August 2002 and March 2007. All procedures (n = 507) began as OPCAB operations, but 99 were converted to BH-CAB during surgery. Each patient's ejection fraction (EF) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively (median, 5.0 days after surgery).
RESULTS: We found that although the BH-CAB patients tended to be in worse health and to have a lower preoperative EF than the OPCAB patients, both groups of patients had similar improvements in postoperative EF (6.8% vs 5.4%; p = 0.65). In addition, multivariable linear regression showed that a lower preoperative EF, age ≥ 70 years, and cardiomegaly predicted less postoperative EF improvement after coronary revascularization by either OPCAB or BH-CAB.
CONCLUSIONS: Both OPCAB and BH-CAB procedures produce significant and similar short-term improvement in EF in patients with coronary disease. This change in EF may account for the subjective clinical improvements seen early after both procedures.