Academic radiology · 2025
Deep Learning-Enhanced Single Breath-Hold Abdominal MRI at 0.55 T-Technical Feasibility and Image Quality Assessment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Seifert Alina Carolin, Breit Hanns-Christian, Obmann Markus M, Korolenko Anastassia, Nickel Marcel Dominik, Fenchel Matthias, Boll Daniel T, Vosshenrich Jan
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Inherently lower signal-to-noise ratios hamper the broad clinical use of low-field abdominal MRI. This study aimed to investigate the technical feasibility and image quality of deep learning (DL)-enhanced T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE-Dixon abdominal MRI at 0.55 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2024 to September 2024, healthy volunteers underwent conventional and DL-enhanced 0.55 T abdominal MRI, including conventional T2 HASTE, fat-suppressed T2 HASTE (HASTE FS), and T1 VIBE-Dixon acquisitions, and DL-enhanced single- (HASTE DLSBH) and multi-breath-hold HASTE (HASTE DLMBH), fat-suppressed single- (HASTE FS DLSBH) and multi-breath-hold HASTE (HASTE FS DLMBH), and T1 VIBE-Dixon (VIBE-DixonDL) acquisitions. Three abdominal radiologists evaluated the scans for quality parameters and artifacts (Likert scale 1-5), and incidental findings. Interreader agreement and comparative analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: 33 healthy volunteers (mean age: 30±4years) were evaluated. Image quality was better for single breath-hold DL-enhanced MRI (all P<0.001) with good or better interreader agreement (κ≥0.61), including T2 HASTE (HASTE DLSBH: 4 [IQR: 4-4] vs. HASTE: 3 [3-3]), T2 HASTE FS (4 [4-4] vs. 3 [3-3]), and T1 VIBE-Dixon (4 [4-5] vs. 4 [3-4]). Similarly, image noise and spatial resolution were better for DL-MRI scans (P<0.001). No quality differences were found between single- and multi-breath-hold HASTE DL or HASTE FS DL (both: 4 [4-4]; P>0.572). The number and size of incidental lesions were identical between techniques (16 lesions; mean diameter 8±5 mm; P=1.000).
CONCLUSION: DL-based image reconstruction enables single breath-hold T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE-Dixon abdominal imaging at 0.55 T with better image quality than conventional MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2024 to September 2024, healthy volunteers underwent conventional and DL-enhanced 0.55 T abdominal MRI, including conventional T2 HASTE, fat-suppressed T2 HASTE (HASTE FS), and T1 VIBE-Dixon acquisitions, and DL-enhanced single- (HASTE DLSBH) and multi-breath-hold HASTE (HASTE DLMBH), fat-suppressed single- (HASTE FS DLSBH) and multi-breath-hold HASTE (HASTE FS DLMBH), and T1 VIBE-Dixon (VIBE-DixonDL) acquisitions. Three abdominal radiologists evaluated the scans for quality parameters and artifacts (Likert scale 1-5), and incidental findings. Interreader agreement and comparative analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: 33 healthy volunteers (mean age: 30±4years) were evaluated. Image quality was better for single breath-hold DL-enhanced MRI (all P<0.001) with good or better interreader agreement (κ≥0.61), including T2 HASTE (HASTE DLSBH: 4 [IQR: 4-4] vs. HASTE: 3 [3-3]), T2 HASTE FS (4 [4-4] vs. 3 [3-3]), and T1 VIBE-Dixon (4 [4-5] vs. 4 [3-4]). Similarly, image noise and spatial resolution were better for DL-MRI scans (P<0.001). No quality differences were found between single- and multi-breath-hold HASTE DL or HASTE FS DL (both: 4 [4-4]; P>0.572). The number and size of incidental lesions were identical between techniques (16 lesions; mean diameter 8±5 mm; P=1.000).
CONCLUSION: DL-based image reconstruction enables single breath-hold T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE-Dixon abdominal imaging at 0.55 T with better image quality than conventional MRI.