Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2013
Comparison between p16 INK4A immunohistochemistry and human papillomavirus polymerase chain reaction assay in oral papillary squamous cell carcinoma.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Argyris Prokopios P, Kademani Deepak, Pambuccian Stefan E, Nguyen Reyna, Tosios Konstantinos I, Koutlas Ioannis G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Oral papillary squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a histologic variant of SCC with a growth pattern suggesting human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of HPV genotypes in OPSCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases with a histologic diagnosis of OPSCC from 1993 through 2008 were retrieved and confirmed. Immunohistochemical evaluation for the surrogate marker p16(INK4A) and HPV polymerase chain reaction were performed in tissue and DNA derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients with confirmed OPSCC (mean age, 71.96 yr; female-to-male ratio, 1.75:1) comprised the study population. The most common site of involvement was the gingiva followed by the palate and buccal mucosa. Forty cases exhibited an invasive component, 1 was noninvasive, and in 3 cases invasion could not be confirmed owing to suboptimal thickness of the biopsy. Paraffin tissue blocks were available in 41 cases. Twenty-three cases (56.1%) exhibited positive p16(INK4A) staining, which was primarily weak to moderate with a generally focal pattern. Polymerase chain reaction assays were negative for HPV DNA in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was a clinical predilection of OPSCC in older women, with most cases occurring in the masticatory mucosa. Weak to moderate and focal p16(INK4A) staining was appreciated in contrast to reported staining properties in genital and oropharyngeal PSCC. Failure of the polymerase chain reaction assay to exhibit transcriptionally active HPV genotypes suggests that HPV is not associated with OPSCC tumorigenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases with a histologic diagnosis of OPSCC from 1993 through 2008 were retrieved and confirmed. Immunohistochemical evaluation for the surrogate marker p16(INK4A) and HPV polymerase chain reaction were performed in tissue and DNA derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients with confirmed OPSCC (mean age, 71.96 yr; female-to-male ratio, 1.75:1) comprised the study population. The most common site of involvement was the gingiva followed by the palate and buccal mucosa. Forty cases exhibited an invasive component, 1 was noninvasive, and in 3 cases invasion could not be confirmed owing to suboptimal thickness of the biopsy. Paraffin tissue blocks were available in 41 cases. Twenty-three cases (56.1%) exhibited positive p16(INK4A) staining, which was primarily weak to moderate with a generally focal pattern. Polymerase chain reaction assays were negative for HPV DNA in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was a clinical predilection of OPSCC in older women, with most cases occurring in the masticatory mucosa. Weak to moderate and focal p16(INK4A) staining was appreciated in contrast to reported staining properties in genital and oropharyngeal PSCC. Failure of the polymerase chain reaction assay to exhibit transcriptionally active HPV genotypes suggests that HPV is not associated with OPSCC tumorigenesis.