Clinical oral implants research · 2012
The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Urdaneta Rainier A, Leary Joseph, Panetta Kimberly M, Chuang Sung-Kiang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single-tooth implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was conducted. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multifactor mixed-effects regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient were utilized to evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels after insertion of single-tooth replacements.
RESULTS: Eighty-one subjects who received 320 Bicon implants were included in the present study. Two hundred and thirty-one implant restorations were opposing natural teeth, 75 implants were opposing implant-supported restorations, 10 implants had no opposing structure and four implants were opposed by a complete denture. The average change in crestal bone levels overtime (AvBL) on implants opposing natural teeth and implant-supported restorations was -0.20 and -0.62 mm, respectively. Hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) mandibular implants opposing natural teeth demonstrated AvBL of +0.01 (indicating bone gain), whereas titanium-plasma sprayed (TPS)-coated mandibular implants opposing implants restored with composite abutment bases demonstrated AvBL of -1.95 mm. When the structure opposing an HA-coated mandibular implant was a natural tooth, it was a predictor of peri-implant bone gain (P = 0.007). While TPS-coated mandibular implants, which had been restored with composite abutment bases, were correlated with peri-implant bone loss when opposed by implant-supported restorations (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the type of opposing structure plays a significant role in mandibular crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants following crown insertion but this effect differ around implants with dissimilar surface coatings and can be exacerbated by local irritating factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was conducted. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multifactor mixed-effects regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient were utilized to evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels after insertion of single-tooth replacements.
RESULTS: Eighty-one subjects who received 320 Bicon implants were included in the present study. Two hundred and thirty-one implant restorations were opposing natural teeth, 75 implants were opposing implant-supported restorations, 10 implants had no opposing structure and four implants were opposed by a complete denture. The average change in crestal bone levels overtime (AvBL) on implants opposing natural teeth and implant-supported restorations was -0.20 and -0.62 mm, respectively. Hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) mandibular implants opposing natural teeth demonstrated AvBL of +0.01 (indicating bone gain), whereas titanium-plasma sprayed (TPS)-coated mandibular implants opposing implants restored with composite abutment bases demonstrated AvBL of -1.95 mm. When the structure opposing an HA-coated mandibular implant was a natural tooth, it was a predictor of peri-implant bone gain (P = 0.007). While TPS-coated mandibular implants, which had been restored with composite abutment bases, were correlated with peri-implant bone loss when opposed by implant-supported restorations (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the type of opposing structure plays a significant role in mandibular crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants following crown insertion but this effect differ around implants with dissimilar surface coatings and can be exacerbated by local irritating factors.