MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13063-025-08847-1

Медицинская библиотека · Trials · 2025

The articulated laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (ATOME trial): a single-arm, prospective trial with pre-specified comparison to robotic surgery.

Kim Kyeong Eui, Bae Sung Uk, Lee Seung Hyun, Lim Dae-Ro, Ha Heon-Kyun, Kim Jin, Ryu Hyo Seon, Park Soo Yeon, Kang Sung Il, Son Gyung Mo, Lee Soo Young, Kim Chang Hyun, Lee Kyung Ha, Ha Gi Won, Kim Hye Jin, Ji Woong Bae, Kim Woo Ram, Kang Sang Hee, Sung Nak Song, Kim Ji Hoon, Lee Taek-Gu, Kim Myung Jo, Jeong Woon Kyung, Baek Seong Kyu

СтатьяПротокол клинического исследованияПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard surgical treatment for rectal cancers, despite being a technically challenging procedure due to the straight and rigid nature of the laparoscopic instrument within a narrow bony pelvis. A robotic system with multi-joint instruments, three-dimensional vision, and improved ergonomics was introduced, however it is not yet cost-effective. Recently, several articulating laparoscopic instruments have been developed and introduced as substitutes for multi-joint robotic system instruments. The prospective study aims to demonstrate that the positive rate of circumferential resection margin following laparoscopic surgery with articulated laparoscopic instruments is non-inferior to that of robotic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS/

DESIGN

Patients with primary rectal cancer who are treated with low anterior resection using articulated laparoscopic instruments will be included in the study. Participating colorectal surgeons must use articulated laparoscopic instruments at least during TME. We hypothesize that the positive rate of circumferential resection margin after robotic surgery will be 6%, 3 based on the previous studies. A trial with 157 patients contributing to the primary outcome analysis would have 80% power to declare non-inferiority with a 5.2% non-inferiority margin, assuming a 10% dropout rate. To compare laparoscopic TME group and robotic TME group, we adjust for variables such as gender, T stage, N stage, sphincter saving status, and preoperative chemoradiation using propensity score matching. The primary end-point of this study is cicumferential resection margin after surgery.

DISCUSSION: Based on this study, we hope to demonstrate the efficacy and viability of articulated laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of rectal cancer at a lower cost than robotic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0008896. Registered on 15 August 2023.

Для цитирования: Kim Kyeong Eui, Bae Sung Uk, Lee Seung Hyun, Lim Dae-Ro, Ha Heon-Kyun, Kim Jin, Ryu Hyo Seon, Park Soo Yeon, Kang Sung Il, Son Gyung Mo, Lee Soo Young, Kim Chang Hyun, Lee Kyung Ha, Ha Gi Won, Kim Hye Jin, Ji Woong Bae, Kim Woo Ram, Kang Sang Hee, Sung Nak Song, Kim Ji Hoon, Lee Taek-Gu, Kim Myung Jo, Jeong Woon Kyung, Baek Seong Kyu. The articulated laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (ATOME trial): a single-arm, prospective trial with pre-specified comparison to robotic surgery.. Trials. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-025-08847-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.