Endocrine · 2018
Cause-specific risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes and hypoglycemic in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Bao, He Fazhong, Sun Lei, Zhou Jiecan, Shen Jiayi, Xu Jing, Wu Bin, Liu Rong, Wang Xingyu, Xu Heng, Chen Xiaoping, Zhou Honghao, Liu Zhaoqian, Zhang Wei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was identified to account for the risk of cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetic patients, but no study evaluated the risk based on both HbA1c and FPG levels. We described the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hypoglycemic in type 2 diabetic patients according to both HbA1c and FPG levels.
METHODS: With the usage of databases of Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE), 1815 patients from 61 centers in China was identified and grouped according to the criterion value of HbA1c and FPG: Good glycemic control (HbA1c < 6.5%, FPG < 6.1 mmol/L); Insufficient glycemic control (HbA1c < 6.5%, FPG ≥ 6.1 mmol/L or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, FPG < 6.1 mmol/L); Poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, FPG ≥ 6.1 mmol/L). Time-varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed.
RESULTS: Average age was 64.8 ± 5.8 years, with a median of 4.8 years of follow-up. Overall, the incidence rates of MACE were 20.6 per 1000-person-years in Good glycemic control compared with 45.9 per 1000-person-years in Insufficient glycemic control (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.99; 95% CI 1.11-3.56; p = 0.02) and 54.7 per 1000-person-years in Poor glycemic control (aHR: 2.46; 95% CI 1.38-4.40; p = 0.002), respectively. The risk of hypoglycemic was highest in Insufficient glycemic control; 67.3 per 1000-person-years compared with 46.3 per 1000-person-years in Good glycemic control (aHR: 1.62; 95% CI 1.03-2.56; p = 0.04). Apart from this, we also observed that both MACE (aHR:1.41; 95% CI 1.13-1.77; p = 0.003) and hypoglycemic episodes (aHR: 1.82; 95% CI 1.48-2.24; p < 0.001) were sufficiently more frequent in the insulin-exposed group than the non-exposed group. In a post-hoc analysis, the risk of MACE (aHR:1.43; 95% CI 1.09-1.86; p = 0.01) and hypoglycemic (aHR: 1.99; 95% CI 1.46-2.69; p < 0.001) were more pronounced in Insufficient glycemic control with insulin exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant association of cause-specific risk of MACE and hypoglycemic with Insufficient glycemic control, particularly with insulin exposure.
METHODS: With the usage of databases of Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE), 1815 patients from 61 centers in China was identified and grouped according to the criterion value of HbA1c and FPG: Good glycemic control (HbA1c < 6.5%, FPG < 6.1 mmol/L); Insufficient glycemic control (HbA1c < 6.5%, FPG ≥ 6.1 mmol/L or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, FPG < 6.1 mmol/L); Poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, FPG ≥ 6.1 mmol/L). Time-varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed.
RESULTS: Average age was 64.8 ± 5.8 years, with a median of 4.8 years of follow-up. Overall, the incidence rates of MACE were 20.6 per 1000-person-years in Good glycemic control compared with 45.9 per 1000-person-years in Insufficient glycemic control (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.99; 95% CI 1.11-3.56; p = 0.02) and 54.7 per 1000-person-years in Poor glycemic control (aHR: 2.46; 95% CI 1.38-4.40; p = 0.002), respectively. The risk of hypoglycemic was highest in Insufficient glycemic control; 67.3 per 1000-person-years compared with 46.3 per 1000-person-years in Good glycemic control (aHR: 1.62; 95% CI 1.03-2.56; p = 0.04). Apart from this, we also observed that both MACE (aHR:1.41; 95% CI 1.13-1.77; p = 0.003) and hypoglycemic episodes (aHR: 1.82; 95% CI 1.48-2.24; p < 0.001) were sufficiently more frequent in the insulin-exposed group than the non-exposed group. In a post-hoc analysis, the risk of MACE (aHR:1.43; 95% CI 1.09-1.86; p = 0.01) and hypoglycemic (aHR: 1.99; 95% CI 1.46-2.69; p < 0.001) were more pronounced in Insufficient glycemic control with insulin exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant association of cause-specific risk of MACE and hypoglycemic with Insufficient glycemic control, particularly with insulin exposure.