Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica · 2002
Duodenal ulcer hemorrhage treated by embolization: results in 28 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Wispelaere J F, De Ronde T, Trigaux J P, de Cannière L, De Geeter T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness and prospects of transcatheter gastroduodenal artery embolization in the control of massive duodenal bleeding and to relate our experience.
METHODS OF STUDY: The study is based on the retrospective analysis of 165 patients with endoscopically detected bleeding duodenal ulcer who presented between 1991-1998. 28 patients were considered eligible for endovascular treatment either at initial presentation or following hemorrhage recurrence after endoscopic therapy.
RESULTS: Technical failure was noted in 3 cases, thereafter treated by surgery. In the other 25 patients, embolization was performed: bleeding recurrence occurred in 7 cases. Four were treated only endoscopically. One was reembolized and the last two were treated by surgery. In 6 cases, a coaxial technique was used (guiding catheter in 2 and 3F microcatheter in 4). No complication related to the catheterization was observed.
CONCLUSION: Transcatheter embolization of the gastroduodenal artery appears to be an efficient procedure even in the absence of active bleeding at the time of the procedure. Failure and recurrence rates can be reduced by using a coaxial technique in the uneasy cases. Embolization seems to have a low recurrence rate and a very low complication rate.
METHODS OF STUDY: The study is based on the retrospective analysis of 165 patients with endoscopically detected bleeding duodenal ulcer who presented between 1991-1998. 28 patients were considered eligible for endovascular treatment either at initial presentation or following hemorrhage recurrence after endoscopic therapy.
RESULTS: Technical failure was noted in 3 cases, thereafter treated by surgery. In the other 25 patients, embolization was performed: bleeding recurrence occurred in 7 cases. Four were treated only endoscopically. One was reembolized and the last two were treated by surgery. In 6 cases, a coaxial technique was used (guiding catheter in 2 and 3F microcatheter in 4). No complication related to the catheterization was observed.
CONCLUSION: Transcatheter embolization of the gastroduodenal artery appears to be an efficient procedure even in the absence of active bleeding at the time of the procedure. Failure and recurrence rates can be reduced by using a coaxial technique in the uneasy cases. Embolization seems to have a low recurrence rate and a very low complication rate.