Disability and rehabilitation · 2002
Development of an integrated care pathway for the management of hemiplegic shoulder pain.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jackson D, Turner-Stokes L, Khatoon A, Stern H, Knight L, O'Connell A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To improve clinical management of patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain through development of an evidence-based multidisciplinary integrated care pathway (ICP), and to use this to audit quality of care against predefined standards.
METHODS: The ICP was developed by a team of medical, paramedical and nursing staff. The evidence base was established through a systematic literature review supplemented by clinical consensus to ensure best practice where scientific evidence was lacking. Following development, performance was assessed against standards in a cohort of stroke patients with hemiplegia (n = 32) consecutively admitted to a regional unit providing in-patient rehabilitation for young patients with complex disabilities.
RESULTS: Performance showed improvements in assessment and documentation of pain and in initial care, including analgesia and application of positioning/handling protocols. However, review and response to continuing or changing symptoms were poorly documented. Changes to the ICP were introduced to improve this.
CONCLUSIONS: Principal benefits have been to raise awareness of shoulder pain, to educate staff and prompt management in line with recommended best practice, but strong leadership is essential to ensure continuity in clinical practice. Future research is needed to establish whether improved quality of care offsets the substantial investment of staff time in ICP development.
METHODS: The ICP was developed by a team of medical, paramedical and nursing staff. The evidence base was established through a systematic literature review supplemented by clinical consensus to ensure best practice where scientific evidence was lacking. Following development, performance was assessed against standards in a cohort of stroke patients with hemiplegia (n = 32) consecutively admitted to a regional unit providing in-patient rehabilitation for young patients with complex disabilities.
RESULTS: Performance showed improvements in assessment and documentation of pain and in initial care, including analgesia and application of positioning/handling protocols. However, review and response to continuing or changing symptoms were poorly documented. Changes to the ICP were introduced to improve this.
CONCLUSIONS: Principal benefits have been to raise awareness of shoulder pain, to educate staff and prompt management in line with recommended best practice, but strong leadership is essential to ensure continuity in clinical practice. Future research is needed to establish whether improved quality of care offsets the substantial investment of staff time in ICP development.