Head & neck · 2024
Predictors of distant metastatic recurrence in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases treated with curative intent: A multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ebrahimi Ardalan, Gupta Ruta, McDowell Lachlan, Magarey Matthew J R, Smith Paul N, Schulte Klaus-Martin, Perriman Diana M, Veness Michael, Porceddu Sandro, Low Tsu-Hui Hubert, Fowler Allan, Clark Jonathan R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify predictors of distant metastatic recurrence (DMR) in patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with nodal metastases treated with curative intent.
METHODS: Predictors of DMR were identified using Cox regression in a multicenter study of 1151 patients.
RESULTS: The 5-year risk of DMR was 9.6%. On multivariate analysis, immunosuppression (HR 2.93; 95% CI: 1.70-5.05; p < 0.001), nodal size >6 cm [versus ≤3 cm (HR 2.77; 95% CI: 1.09-7.03; p = 0.032)], ≥5 nodal metastases [versus 1-2 (HR 2.79; 95% CI: 1.63-4.78; p < 0.001)], and bilateral disease (HR 3.11; 95% CI: 1.40-6.90; p = 0.005) predicted DMR. A DMR risk score was developed that stratified risk from 6.6% (no risk factors) to 100% (≥3 risk factors) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DMR in nodal metastatic HNcSCC increases with immunosuppression, nodal size >6 cm, ≥5 nodal metastases, and bilateral disease. A simple DMR risk score estimated prior to treatment may be clinically useful.
METHODS: Predictors of DMR were identified using Cox regression in a multicenter study of 1151 patients.
RESULTS: The 5-year risk of DMR was 9.6%. On multivariate analysis, immunosuppression (HR 2.93; 95% CI: 1.70-5.05; p < 0.001), nodal size >6 cm [versus ≤3 cm (HR 2.77; 95% CI: 1.09-7.03; p = 0.032)], ≥5 nodal metastases [versus 1-2 (HR 2.79; 95% CI: 1.63-4.78; p < 0.001)], and bilateral disease (HR 3.11; 95% CI: 1.40-6.90; p = 0.005) predicted DMR. A DMR risk score was developed that stratified risk from 6.6% (no risk factors) to 100% (≥3 risk factors) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DMR in nodal metastatic HNcSCC increases with immunosuppression, nodal size >6 cm, ≥5 nodal metastases, and bilateral disease. A simple DMR risk score estimated prior to treatment may be clinically useful.