DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.111
It Is Time to Reduce Free-Hand Manipulation: Case Report of Our Proposal for an Innovative 1-Step Cranioplasty.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cranioplasty is a well-known procedure, and autologous graft bone is usually considered the best choice in this procedure, but it cannot be used in conditions such as bone-infiltrating tumors, spheno-orbital en plaque meningiomas, and bone infections. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) offers great possibility of intraoperative adaption. We describe a case of 1-step cranioplasty performed in a patient with a meningeal fibrosarcoma using a custom-made silicon mold.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 48-year-old man was admitted to our department for a left temporo-parietal subcutaneous tumefaction that grew for a few months on the site of a previous osteodural decompression. After a biopsy that was diagnostic for meningeal fibrosarcoma, we planned tumor asportation, considering the bone infiltration of the tumor and the necessity of a cranioplasty. Before the intervention, we performed the craniotomy on a gypsum powder head phantom created based on a computed tomography scan. Then, using a computer-assisted design technique, a silicon mold was created and sterilized for the intervention. The edges of the preoperative simulated craniectomy were reproduced during the intervention using a rigid rail on the patient's scalp. The craniectomy was performed, and the tumor was removed. Then, a PMMA bone flap was made using a silicon mold and was fixed to the skull by miniscrews. Aesthetic results were considered excellent by the patient.
CONCLUSIONS
We performed a 1-step cranioplasty after resection of a meningeal fibrosarcoma that infiltrated bone with a new technique to reproduce during intervention a preoperative simulated craniectomy and a computer-assisted design PMMA flap.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.