American journal of clinical oncology · 2021
A Simple, Novel Prognostic Score in Platinum Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goenka Luxitaa, Nakka Thejeshwar, Dubashi Biswajit, Kayal Smita, Penumadu Prasanth, Chaturvedula Latha, Veena Pampapati, Durairaj Jayalakshmi, Ganesan Prasanth
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the commonest gynecologic cancers and one with the highest mortality. This retrospective cohort study was done to identify predictors of outcomes in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer patients (PS-ROC).
METHODS: Data regarding baseline characters, laboratory findings, therapeutic details and survival outcomes was obtained from the medical records of PS-ROC patients presented between January 2015 and December 2019. Prognostic score was constructed using factors which were significant on multivariate analysis to predict survival outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 71 (PS-ROC) patients were included in the study with a median age of 50 years. Relapse treatment was either chemotherapy alone (n=53, 75%) or chemotherapy plus surgery (n=18, 25%). The estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 10 and 29 months, respectively. The overall response rate after treatment of relapse was 59%. Prognostic score was created with the 3 factors (each scoring 1 point) which were predictive of PFS (higher lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, longer platinum-free interval and secondary cytoreduction). Patients with low score (0,1) had better PFS than those with higher score (2,3) (13 vs. 7 mo [P=0.0001]).
CONCLUSIONS: A composite prognostic score could predict outcomes in PS-ROC and potentially identify a subgroup with very poor prognosis. Future studies with a greater number of patients are needed to validate these findings. This information could help tailor more intense therapies to the high-risk patients and attempt to improve outcomes and serve as stratification factors for prospective trials.
METHODS: Data regarding baseline characters, laboratory findings, therapeutic details and survival outcomes was obtained from the medical records of PS-ROC patients presented between January 2015 and December 2019. Prognostic score was constructed using factors which were significant on multivariate analysis to predict survival outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 71 (PS-ROC) patients were included in the study with a median age of 50 years. Relapse treatment was either chemotherapy alone (n=53, 75%) or chemotherapy plus surgery (n=18, 25%). The estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 10 and 29 months, respectively. The overall response rate after treatment of relapse was 59%. Prognostic score was created with the 3 factors (each scoring 1 point) which were predictive of PFS (higher lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, longer platinum-free interval and secondary cytoreduction). Patients with low score (0,1) had better PFS than those with higher score (2,3) (13 vs. 7 mo [P=0.0001]).
CONCLUSIONS: A composite prognostic score could predict outcomes in PS-ROC and potentially identify a subgroup with very poor prognosis. Future studies with a greater number of patients are needed to validate these findings. This information could help tailor more intense therapies to the high-risk patients and attempt to improve outcomes and serve as stratification factors for prospective trials.