Clinical nuclear medicine · 2025
Comparison of Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation and Staging of Hepatobiliary Malignancies : A Single-center Prospective Study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hou Guozhu, Cheng Xin, Jiang Yuanyuan, Yang Yi, Chen Bo, Huang Zhen, Li Zhuo, Zhou Aiping, Chen Xiaoyuan, Zheng Rong, Zhao Hong, Zhang Jingjing, Wang Xuejuan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial for the management of patients with hepatobiliary malignancies. Here, we investigated the efficacy of Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT in detecting hepatobiliary malignancies and compared the results with 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants with hepatobiliary malignancies were prospectively enrolled and underwent paired Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT from April 2023 to March 2024. Histopathology and/or follow-up imaging served as the reference standard. The SUVmax of the primary and metastatic lesions between Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The association between Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 uptake intensity and immunohistochemical FAP expression was analyzed with Spearman r correlation.
RESULTS: Our cohort comprised of 28 patients with hepatobiliary malignancies, including 12 with hepatocellular carcinoma, 13 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 2 with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 with gallbladder carcinoma. Of these 28 patients, 13 underwent PET/CT for initial staging and 15 for restaging. Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity than 18 F-FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumors [100% (13/13) vs 92.3% (12/13)], lymph node metastases [79.2% (42/53) vs 54.7% (29/53)], and bone and visceral metastases [97.6% (164/168) vs 69.0% (116/168)]. Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT findings led to upstaging or restaging in 6 of 28 patients compared with the 18 F-FDG PET/CT-based stage. In addition, Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT detected tumor-related obstructive inflammation in 7 patients, while 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected it in only 1 patient (25% vs 3.6%). All these 7 patients suffered from cholangiocarcinomas, including 5 with ICC and 2 with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. The SUVmax of obstructive inflammation on Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT was significantly lower than that of tumor (median SUVmax, 4.0 vs 8.8; P = 0.008). A positive correlation was found between FAPI uptake and FAP expression ( r = 0.730, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hepatobiliary malignancies, Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT outperformed 18 F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary tumors and metastatic lesions, resulting in more accurate staging or restaging. In addition, Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed good detection efficacy for tumor-related obstructive inflammation, which was only found in cholangiocarcinoma, thus rendering Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 the potential to differentiate ICC from hepatocellular carcinoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants with hepatobiliary malignancies were prospectively enrolled and underwent paired Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT from April 2023 to March 2024. Histopathology and/or follow-up imaging served as the reference standard. The SUVmax of the primary and metastatic lesions between Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The association between Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 uptake intensity and immunohistochemical FAP expression was analyzed with Spearman r correlation.
RESULTS: Our cohort comprised of 28 patients with hepatobiliary malignancies, including 12 with hepatocellular carcinoma, 13 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 2 with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 with gallbladder carcinoma. Of these 28 patients, 13 underwent PET/CT for initial staging and 15 for restaging. Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity than 18 F-FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumors [100% (13/13) vs 92.3% (12/13)], lymph node metastases [79.2% (42/53) vs 54.7% (29/53)], and bone and visceral metastases [97.6% (164/168) vs 69.0% (116/168)]. Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT findings led to upstaging or restaging in 6 of 28 patients compared with the 18 F-FDG PET/CT-based stage. In addition, Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT detected tumor-related obstructive inflammation in 7 patients, while 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected it in only 1 patient (25% vs 3.6%). All these 7 patients suffered from cholangiocarcinomas, including 5 with ICC and 2 with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. The SUVmax of obstructive inflammation on Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT was significantly lower than that of tumor (median SUVmax, 4.0 vs 8.8; P = 0.008). A positive correlation was found between FAPI uptake and FAP expression ( r = 0.730, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hepatobiliary malignancies, Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT outperformed 18 F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary tumors and metastatic lesions, resulting in more accurate staging or restaging. In addition, Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed good detection efficacy for tumor-related obstructive inflammation, which was only found in cholangiocarcinoma, thus rendering Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 the potential to differentiate ICC from hepatocellular carcinoma.