MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1532/hsf.1630

Медицинская библиотека · The heart surgery forum · 2016

Concomitant CABG, Left Ventricular Restoration and Mitral Valve Repair for Ischemic Heart Disease.

Zhaohua Yin, Wei Feng, Fei Xu, Jiqiang Zhang, Junzhe Du, Yangwu Song

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate the effects of combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), surgical left ventricular restoration (LVR), and mitral valve repair (MVP) in treating ischemic heart disease combined with mitral regurgitation; and to evaluate the different strategies of LVR and MVP.

METHODS

From January 2001 to December 2015, 61 consecutive patients with left ventricular aneurysm and ischemic mitral regurgitation underwent concomitant CABG, LVR and MVP. We evaluated the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of the patients. The mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 3.3 years.

RESULTS

The operative mortality was 4.9%. One-, five-, and ten-year survival rates were 95.1%, 86.9%, and 80.3%, respectively. Mitral regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) improved significantly after surgery (P < .001). During follow-up, 3 patients (5.2%) had moderate mitral regurgitation and 1 patient (1.9%) had severe mitral regurgitation. The clinical outcomes were not influenced by the LVR technique and MVP approach.

CONCLUSION

Combined CABG, LVR, and MVP was effective for ischemic left ventricular aneurysm with mitral regurgitation. The procedure was associated with acceptable operative risk and clinical outcomes.

Для цитирования: Zhaohua Yin, Wei Feng, Fei Xu, Jiqiang Zhang, Junzhe Du, Yangwu Song. Concomitant CABG, Left Ventricular Restoration and Mitral Valve Repair for Ischemic Heart Disease.. The heart surgery forum. 2016. DOI: 10.1532/hsf.1630.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.