The Journal of surgical research · 2016
Neochord placement versus triangular resection in mitral valve repair: A finite element model.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morgan Ashley E, Pantoja Joe L, Grossi Eugene A, Ge Liang, Weinsaft Jonathan W, Ratcliffe Mark B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair is common, occurring in nearly 50% of patients within 10 years of surgery. Durability of repair is partly related to stress distribution over the mitral leaflets. We hypothesized that repair with neochords (NCs) results in lower stress than leaflet resection (LR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging and 3D echocardiography were performed before surgical repair of P2 prolapse in a single patient. A finite element model of the left ventricle and mitral valve was created previously, and the modeling program LS-DYNA was used to calculate leaflet stress for the following repairs: Triangular LR; LR with ring annuloplasty (LR + RA); One NC; Two NCs; and 2NC + RA.
RESULTS: (1) NC placement resulted in stable posterior leaflet stress: Baseline versus 2 NC at end diastole (ED), 12.1 versus 12.0 kPa, at end systole (ES) 20.3 versus 21.7 kPa. (2) In contrast, LR increased posterior leaflet stress: Baseline versus LR at ED 12.1 versus 40.8 kPa, at ES 20.3 versus 46.1 kPa. (3) All repair types reduced anterior leaflet stress: Baseline versus 2 NC versus LR 34.2 versus 25.8 versus 20.6 kPa at ED and 80.8 versus 76.8 versus 67.8 kPa at ES. (4) The addition of RA reduced leaflet stress relative to repair without RA.
CONCLUSIONS: Neochord repair restored normal leaflet coaptation without creating excessive leaflet stress, whereas leaflet resection more than doubled stress across the posterior leaflet. The excess stress created by leaflet resection was partially, but not completely, mitigated by ring annuloplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging and 3D echocardiography were performed before surgical repair of P2 prolapse in a single patient. A finite element model of the left ventricle and mitral valve was created previously, and the modeling program LS-DYNA was used to calculate leaflet stress for the following repairs: Triangular LR; LR with ring annuloplasty (LR + RA); One NC; Two NCs; and 2NC + RA.
RESULTS: (1) NC placement resulted in stable posterior leaflet stress: Baseline versus 2 NC at end diastole (ED), 12.1 versus 12.0 kPa, at end systole (ES) 20.3 versus 21.7 kPa. (2) In contrast, LR increased posterior leaflet stress: Baseline versus LR at ED 12.1 versus 40.8 kPa, at ES 20.3 versus 46.1 kPa. (3) All repair types reduced anterior leaflet stress: Baseline versus 2 NC versus LR 34.2 versus 25.8 versus 20.6 kPa at ED and 80.8 versus 76.8 versus 67.8 kPa at ES. (4) The addition of RA reduced leaflet stress relative to repair without RA.
CONCLUSIONS: Neochord repair restored normal leaflet coaptation without creating excessive leaflet stress, whereas leaflet resection more than doubled stress across the posterior leaflet. The excess stress created by leaflet resection was partially, but not completely, mitigated by ring annuloplasty.