Veterinary dermatology · 2024
Efficacy of verdinexor for the treatment of naïve canine epitheliotropic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: An open-label pilot study.
СтатьяClinical Trial, VeterinaryНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vlodaver Elana M, Keating M Kelly, Bidot Willie A, Bruyette David S, Rosenkrantz Wayne S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Verdinexor (Laverdia-CA1; Dechra Veterinary Products), a selective inhibitor of nuclear export, has been utilised for treatment of non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphoma in dogs. However, the efficacy of verdinexor has not been evaluated for cutaneous epitheliotropic T-cell lymphoma (CETL).
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of verdinexor for the treatment of CETL.
ANIMALS: Eight client-owned animals with CETL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received between 1.28 and 1.45 mg/kg verdinexor per os twice weekly with a minimum of 72 h between doses until disease progression or voluntary withdrawal. Adjunctive therapy with lokivetmab or prednisone was permitted after Day (D)14. Assessment of clinical lesions (canine Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [cRECIST v1.0] and novel Canine Epitheliotropic Lymphoma Extent and Severity Index [CELESI]), pruritus (Visual Analog Scale) and treatment efficacy (owner global assessment of treatment efficacy [OGATE]) were evaluated every 14 days for 3 months, then monthly thereafter (mean 70 ± 43.4 days).
RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients achieved complete response, partial response or stable disease. The mean time to disease progression was 56 ± 41 days. There was a significant reduction (p = 0.026) in total CELESI score when the lowest score for each dog was compared to their score at D0. Verdinexor did not significantly reduce pruritus at any time point (p = 0.45), including when given as a monotherapy or concurrently with lokivetmab ± glucocorticoids. On D28, 75% of owners rated response to treatment as 'fair' to 'excellent'. The most common adverse effects included weight loss, inappetence, vomiting and lethargy.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Verdinexor could be considered a safe, palliative treatment for canine CETL.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of verdinexor for the treatment of CETL.
ANIMALS: Eight client-owned animals with CETL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received between 1.28 and 1.45 mg/kg verdinexor per os twice weekly with a minimum of 72 h between doses until disease progression or voluntary withdrawal. Adjunctive therapy with lokivetmab or prednisone was permitted after Day (D)14. Assessment of clinical lesions (canine Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [cRECIST v1.0] and novel Canine Epitheliotropic Lymphoma Extent and Severity Index [CELESI]), pruritus (Visual Analog Scale) and treatment efficacy (owner global assessment of treatment efficacy [OGATE]) were evaluated every 14 days for 3 months, then monthly thereafter (mean 70 ± 43.4 days).
RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients achieved complete response, partial response or stable disease. The mean time to disease progression was 56 ± 41 days. There was a significant reduction (p = 0.026) in total CELESI score when the lowest score for each dog was compared to their score at D0. Verdinexor did not significantly reduce pruritus at any time point (p = 0.45), including when given as a monotherapy or concurrently with lokivetmab ± glucocorticoids. On D28, 75% of owners rated response to treatment as 'fair' to 'excellent'. The most common adverse effects included weight loss, inappetence, vomiting and lethargy.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Verdinexor could be considered a safe, palliative treatment for canine CETL.