BMC cancer · 2025
Ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computer tomography features of hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma and hepatic sarcoma: a retrospective study of 23 cases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Long Xingyun, Shen Haiyun, Wu Jie, Liu Han, Huang Danqing, Kong Wentao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma (HSC) and hepatic sarcoma (HS) are rare malignancies. Without pathology, the differential diagnosis between these two tumors is difficult due to their frequent overlaps in clinical presentations and imaging features. Currently, there are limited analyses about the ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) characteristics of HSC and HS. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to evaluate the value of US, CEUS and CECT on the differential diagnosis between HSC and HS.
METHODS: From 2015 to 2022, a total of 23 patients with HSC (n = 11) and HS (n = 12) are included in this retrospective study. We analyze the clinical, pathological, and imaging data of these patients. Analysis of differences is performed to determine the consistent and distinctive features.
RESULTS: HSCs have a considerably higher prevalence of chronic hepatitis (p = 0.005) and cirrhosis (p = 0.027) than HSs, while metastases are more prevalent in HSs (p = 0.005). The lesion size of HSCs (8.1 ± 2.2 cm) is slightly larger than that of HSs (6.2 ± 3.4 cm). On conventional US, the characteristics of HS and HSC are similar. In CEUS, HSCs consistently showed heterogeneous enhancement patterns, while HSs, particularly hepatic angiosarcoma (HA), demonstrated a higher prevalence of hyperintensity (75%). On CECT, all masses in both groups exhibited low density. A statistically significant difference in margin clarity was observed between HSC and HS (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: HSC and HS generally present as masses with hypo-echoic and hypo-vascularity. HSC usually presents heterogeneous density. The degree of enhancement, the time of wash-out start, and the presence of necrotic areas may contribute to distinguish the different pathological types of HS.
METHODS: From 2015 to 2022, a total of 23 patients with HSC (n = 11) and HS (n = 12) are included in this retrospective study. We analyze the clinical, pathological, and imaging data of these patients. Analysis of differences is performed to determine the consistent and distinctive features.
RESULTS: HSCs have a considerably higher prevalence of chronic hepatitis (p = 0.005) and cirrhosis (p = 0.027) than HSs, while metastases are more prevalent in HSs (p = 0.005). The lesion size of HSCs (8.1 ± 2.2 cm) is slightly larger than that of HSs (6.2 ± 3.4 cm). On conventional US, the characteristics of HS and HSC are similar. In CEUS, HSCs consistently showed heterogeneous enhancement patterns, while HSs, particularly hepatic angiosarcoma (HA), demonstrated a higher prevalence of hyperintensity (75%). On CECT, all masses in both groups exhibited low density. A statistically significant difference in margin clarity was observed between HSC and HS (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: HSC and HS generally present as masses with hypo-echoic and hypo-vascularity. HSC usually presents heterogeneous density. The degree of enhancement, the time of wash-out start, and the presence of necrotic areas may contribute to distinguish the different pathological types of HS.