Modelling immune gene expression profiles as pharmacodynamic endpoints of antileishmanial treatment.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a neglected infectious disease caused by the intracellular protozoan parasite Leishmania, affects over one million people annually. The type and magnitude of the inflammatory response elicited during infection lead to skin-specific immunopathology, resulting in the clinical manifestations of CL. Systemic antileishmanial drugs are the main control measure; however, these are highly toxic, of long duration, and difficult to access for affected populations. New drugs and optimized regimens are urgently needed. Despite the known participation of immune responses in the pathology of CL, preclinical drug evaluations target parasite elimination as the efficacy measure. This overlooks the potential of host immune responses to influence therapeutic success.
METHODS
In this study, we evaluated the performance of non-linear pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models in recreating the exposure-response relationships between plasma antimony (Sb) concentrations in CL patients treated with Glucantime (SbV as meglumine antimoniate) and the gene expression dynamics of pro-inflammatory mediators in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
RESULTS
A one-compartment PK model, coupled to an indirect PD model with endogenous regulators, fitted the data well, explaining 80%-90% of the variance. Our results suggest a mechanism of drug-dependent immune gene regulation involving modulation of cell signalling and RNA stability in CL patients who have been cured after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The model presented herein can be used for evaluating immune gene expression, alongside parasite kill, as PD endpoints of antileishmanials, both for new drug developments and in optimization of available drug regimens.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.