Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses · 2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Nurse Anesthetist-Led Preanesthesia Evaluation for Patients With Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study With Coarsened Exact Matching Method.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yin Lin, Li Yuanyuan, Ma Dongmei, Hu Jiale, Zhu Shuying, Xia Xueqin, Yang Quan, Zou Jiang, Liao Limei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of nurse anesthetist-led preanesthesia evaluation in patients with cancer.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study with a historical comparison group.
METHODS: Data of patients with cancer and undergoing surgery and preanesthesia evaluation 1 year before and after the implementation of nurse anesthetist-led preanesthesia evaluation were collected from electronic medical systems. A coarsened exact matching approach was applied to match the pre- and post groups based on eight characteristic variables. The Student t test and the χ2 test were used for data analysis.
FINDINGS: After matching, 8,393 patients both in the exposure and comparison groups were analyzed. The proportion of preanesthesia assessments completed before the day of surgery increased from 41.5% to 96.8%; the total number of cancellations of surgery decreased from 30 (0.36%) to 9 (0.11%) with substantial declines in procedure cancellations due to arrhythmia (10, 0.12% vs 0, 0%) and incomplete preoperative investigations (12, 0.14% vs 2, 0.02%). Unplanned stay in the postanesthesia care unit longer than 2 hours significantly decreased from 176 (2.1%) to 139 (1.66%). Other anesthesia-related outcomes were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse anesthetist-led preanesthesia evaluation for cancer patients was effective and safe. Future studies should use a more rigorous study design or a parallel comparison to strengthen the findings in this area.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study with a historical comparison group.
METHODS: Data of patients with cancer and undergoing surgery and preanesthesia evaluation 1 year before and after the implementation of nurse anesthetist-led preanesthesia evaluation were collected from electronic medical systems. A coarsened exact matching approach was applied to match the pre- and post groups based on eight characteristic variables. The Student t test and the χ2 test were used for data analysis.
FINDINGS: After matching, 8,393 patients both in the exposure and comparison groups were analyzed. The proportion of preanesthesia assessments completed before the day of surgery increased from 41.5% to 96.8%; the total number of cancellations of surgery decreased from 30 (0.36%) to 9 (0.11%) with substantial declines in procedure cancellations due to arrhythmia (10, 0.12% vs 0, 0%) and incomplete preoperative investigations (12, 0.14% vs 2, 0.02%). Unplanned stay in the postanesthesia care unit longer than 2 hours significantly decreased from 176 (2.1%) to 139 (1.66%). Other anesthesia-related outcomes were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse anesthetist-led preanesthesia evaluation for cancer patients was effective and safe. Future studies should use a more rigorous study design or a parallel comparison to strengthen the findings in this area.