PloS one · 2024
Diagnostic ability of confocal scanning ophthalmoscope for the detection of concurrent retinal disease in eyes with asteroid hyalosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Su Hwan, Chey Ji Hyoung, Heo Jun, Han Kwang Eon, Park Sung Who, Byon Iksoo, Kwon Han Jo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic capacity of a color fundus camera (CFC), ultra-wide-field bicolor confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (BC-cSLO; OPTOS), and true-color confocal scanning ophthalmoscope (TC-cSO; EIDON) in detecting coexisting retinal diseases in eyes with asteroid hyalosis (AH).
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with AH who were referred to a tertiary hospital for subsequent assessment by a vitreoretinal specialist were retrospectively reviewed. Fundus images obtained simultaneously using CFC, BC-cSLO, and TC-cSO were classified into four grades based on their obscuration by asteroid bodies. The proportion of Grade 1 images (minimal obscuration group) was assessed for each imaging modality. The diagnostic and screening abilities for concurrent retinal diseases were compared in terms of the accuracy and sensitivity of each device.
RESULTS: Among the 100 eyes with AH, 76 had coexisting retinal diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), retinal vascular occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, and retinitis pigmentosa. TC-cSO had the highest ratio of Grade 1 images (94%, P<0.001), followed by CFC (67%) and BC-cSLO (63%). CFC and BC-cSLO exhibited a 5.3-fold higher rate of significant obscuration than TC-cSO (P<0.001, 95% confidence intervals = 2.4~11.6 folds). TC-cSO demonstrated the highest accuracy and sensitivity (95% and 81%, respectively) compared with CFC (89% and 43%, respectively) and BC-cSLO (89% and 39%, respectively) for all retinal diseases. BC-cSLO showed the best performance for DR diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: TC-cSO images showed minimal obscuration and a superior ability for diagnosing retinal diseases accompanied by AH over other imaging devices. TC-cSO can be a valuable alternative screening tool for detecting retinal diseases when AH impedes fundus imaging.
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with AH who were referred to a tertiary hospital for subsequent assessment by a vitreoretinal specialist were retrospectively reviewed. Fundus images obtained simultaneously using CFC, BC-cSLO, and TC-cSO were classified into four grades based on their obscuration by asteroid bodies. The proportion of Grade 1 images (minimal obscuration group) was assessed for each imaging modality. The diagnostic and screening abilities for concurrent retinal diseases were compared in terms of the accuracy and sensitivity of each device.
RESULTS: Among the 100 eyes with AH, 76 had coexisting retinal diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), retinal vascular occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, and retinitis pigmentosa. TC-cSO had the highest ratio of Grade 1 images (94%, P<0.001), followed by CFC (67%) and BC-cSLO (63%). CFC and BC-cSLO exhibited a 5.3-fold higher rate of significant obscuration than TC-cSO (P<0.001, 95% confidence intervals = 2.4~11.6 folds). TC-cSO demonstrated the highest accuracy and sensitivity (95% and 81%, respectively) compared with CFC (89% and 43%, respectively) and BC-cSLO (89% and 39%, respectively) for all retinal diseases. BC-cSLO showed the best performance for DR diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: TC-cSO images showed minimal obscuration and a superior ability for diagnosing retinal diseases accompanied by AH over other imaging devices. TC-cSO can be a valuable alternative screening tool for detecting retinal diseases when AH impedes fundus imaging.