Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi = Zhonghua yixue yichuanxue zazhi = Chinese journal of medical genetics · 2009
[Mutation analysis of SMN gene in a patient and his family with spinal muscular atrophy].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zeng Jian, Lin Yan-hong, Yan Ai-zhen, Cai Mei-ying, Ke Long-feng, Lan Feng-hua
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To perform mutation analysis and describe the genotype of the SMN gene in a patient with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and his family.
METHODS: Deletion analysis of the SMN1 exon 7 by conventional PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and allele-specific PCR, and gene dosage of SMN1 and SMN2 by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were performed for the patient and his parents; reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and sequencing were performed for the patient. To determine whether the SMN variant was exclusive to transcripts derived from SMN1, the RT-PCR product of the patient was subcloned and multiple clones were sequenced directly; PCR of SMN exon 5 from the genomic DNA of the parents and direct sequencing were performed to confirm the mutation.
RESULTS: In SMN1 exon 7 deletion analysis, no homozygous deletion of the SMN1 was observed in the family; the gene dosage analysis by MLPA showed that the patient had 1 copy of SMN1 and 1 copy of SMN2 his father had 2 copies of SMN1 and 2 copies of SMN2, and his mother had 1 copy of SMN1 and no SMN2. A previously unreported missense mutation of S230L was identified from the patient and this mutation was also found in his father.
CONCLUSION: A novel missense mutation of S230L was identified in the SMA family and the genotype of the family members were investigated.
METHODS: Deletion analysis of the SMN1 exon 7 by conventional PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and allele-specific PCR, and gene dosage of SMN1 and SMN2 by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were performed for the patient and his parents; reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and sequencing were performed for the patient. To determine whether the SMN variant was exclusive to transcripts derived from SMN1, the RT-PCR product of the patient was subcloned and multiple clones were sequenced directly; PCR of SMN exon 5 from the genomic DNA of the parents and direct sequencing were performed to confirm the mutation.
RESULTS: In SMN1 exon 7 deletion analysis, no homozygous deletion of the SMN1 was observed in the family; the gene dosage analysis by MLPA showed that the patient had 1 copy of SMN1 and 1 copy of SMN2 his father had 2 copies of SMN1 and 2 copies of SMN2, and his mother had 1 copy of SMN1 and no SMN2. A previously unreported missense mutation of S230L was identified from the patient and this mutation was also found in his father.
CONCLUSION: A novel missense mutation of S230L was identified in the SMA family and the genotype of the family members were investigated.