Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
Prognostic impact of nutritional and inflammation-based risk scores in follicular lymphoma in the era of anti-CD20 targeted treatment strategies.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gebauer Niklas, Mengler Britta, Kopelke Svenja, Frydrychowicz Alex, Fürschke Alexander, Hackenbroch Carsten, Bauer Arthur, Riecke Armin, von Bubnoff Nikolaus, Fetscher Sebastian, Witte Hanno M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is conditioned by immunity and the inflammatory response. Nutritional and inflammation-based risk scores have emerged as relevant predictors of survival outcome across a variety of hematological malignancies.
METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter trial, we ascertained the prognostic impact of established nutritional and inflammation-based risk scores [Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), C-reactive-protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and prognostic index (PI)] in 209 eligible patients with histologically confirmed CD20+ follicular lymphoma (FL) of WHO grade 1 (37.3%), 1-2 (16.3%), 2 (26.8%) or 3A (19.8%) admitted to the participating centers between January 2000 and December 2019. Characteristics significantly associated with overall or progression-free survival (OS, PFS) upon univariate analysis were subsequently included in a Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: In the study cohort, the median age was 63 (range 22-90 years). The median follow-up period covered 99 months. The GPS and the CAR were identified to predict survival in FL patients. The GPS was the only independent predictor of OS (p < 0.0001; HR 2.773; 95% CI 1.630-4.719) and PFS (p = 0.001; HR 1.995; 95% CI 1.352-2.944) upon multivariate analysis. Additionally, there was frequent occurrence of progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) in FL patients with a calculated GPS of 2.
CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that the GPS predicts especially OS in FL patients. Moreover, GPS was found to display disease-specific effects in regard to FL progression. These findings and potential combinations with additional established prognosticators should be further validated within prospective clinical trials.
METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter trial, we ascertained the prognostic impact of established nutritional and inflammation-based risk scores [Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), C-reactive-protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and prognostic index (PI)] in 209 eligible patients with histologically confirmed CD20+ follicular lymphoma (FL) of WHO grade 1 (37.3%), 1-2 (16.3%), 2 (26.8%) or 3A (19.8%) admitted to the participating centers between January 2000 and December 2019. Characteristics significantly associated with overall or progression-free survival (OS, PFS) upon univariate analysis were subsequently included in a Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: In the study cohort, the median age was 63 (range 22-90 years). The median follow-up period covered 99 months. The GPS and the CAR were identified to predict survival in FL patients. The GPS was the only independent predictor of OS (p < 0.0001; HR 2.773; 95% CI 1.630-4.719) and PFS (p = 0.001; HR 1.995; 95% CI 1.352-2.944) upon multivariate analysis. Additionally, there was frequent occurrence of progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) in FL patients with a calculated GPS of 2.
CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that the GPS predicts especially OS in FL patients. Moreover, GPS was found to display disease-specific effects in regard to FL progression. These findings and potential combinations with additional established prognosticators should be further validated within prospective clinical trials.