Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2007
Novel therapeutic aspects of percutaneous aortic valve replacement with the 21F CoreValve Revalving System.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berry Colin, Asgar Anita, Lamarche Yoan, Marcheix Bertrand, Couture Pierre, Basmadjian Arsène, Ducharme Anique, Laborde Jean-Claude, Cartier Raymond, Bonan Raoul
Аннотация
AIMS: Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) is an emerging therapy for nonsurgical patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We investigated whether novel therapeutic approaches may facilitate AVR outcomes for high-risk patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients [n = 6 (54%) men] aged 82 +/- 10 years underwent PAVR after being refused for open surgery. The mean+/-SD AV area and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of these patients was 0.56 +/- 0.19 cm(2) and 49 +/- 17%, respectively, with severe functional limitation (NYHA class III (n = 8) and IV (n = 3)). One patient underwent PAVR combined with simultaneous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Two male patients needed left iliac artery angioplasty. A percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) was used in the most recent case. Compared with pre-PAVR, mean AV area (1.3 +/- 0.4 cm(2); P < 0.001) and LVEF (56 +/- 11%; P < 0.001) increased. One man had a peri-procedural stroke and died 5 days post-PAVR. Four other patients died within 4 months of hospital discharge. The median duration of survival of the survivors was 305 (range 249-431) days.
CONCLUSIONS: Novel percutaneous techniques facilitate CoreValve PAVR (21 Fr.). Future lower profile devices (e.g. 18 Fr. Generation III CoreValve) should permit inclusion of a broader spectrum of high-risk patients. PAVR may evolve toward a full percutaneous approach.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients [n = 6 (54%) men] aged 82 +/- 10 years underwent PAVR after being refused for open surgery. The mean+/-SD AV area and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of these patients was 0.56 +/- 0.19 cm(2) and 49 +/- 17%, respectively, with severe functional limitation (NYHA class III (n = 8) and IV (n = 3)). One patient underwent PAVR combined with simultaneous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Two male patients needed left iliac artery angioplasty. A percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) was used in the most recent case. Compared with pre-PAVR, mean AV area (1.3 +/- 0.4 cm(2); P < 0.001) and LVEF (56 +/- 11%; P < 0.001) increased. One man had a peri-procedural stroke and died 5 days post-PAVR. Four other patients died within 4 months of hospital discharge. The median duration of survival of the survivors was 305 (range 249-431) days.
CONCLUSIONS: Novel percutaneous techniques facilitate CoreValve PAVR (21 Fr.). Future lower profile devices (e.g. 18 Fr. Generation III CoreValve) should permit inclusion of a broader spectrum of high-risk patients. PAVR may evolve toward a full percutaneous approach.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, BalloonAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCanadaCombined Modality TherapyEchocardiography, TransesophagealFeasibility StudiesFemaleFranceHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHeart-Assist DevicesHumansMaleProsthesis DesignSeverity of Illness IndexStroke VolumeTime FactorsTreatment Outcome