Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2020
Faecal Micro-RNAs in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Verdier Julien, Breunig Irene Raphaela, Ohse Margarete Clara, Roubrocks Silvia, Kleinfeld Sandra, Roy Sanchari, Streetz Konrad, Trautwein Christian, Roderburg Christoph, Sellge Gernot
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Faecal biomarkers are used as indicators of disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD], which include Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]. Micro-RNAs [miRNAs] are small non-coding RNAs detectable in extracellular fluids and can be used as clinical biomarkers. The aim of this study was to determine if faecal miRNA composition is altered in IBD.
METHODS: More than 800 different human faecal miRNAs were measured in stool samples from control individuals and patients with active CD by using NanoString technology. Selected miRNAs were quantified by qRT-PCR in faeces, serum and intestinal tissue of controls [n = 23] and patients with inactive or active CD [n = 22, n = 22] or UC [n = 11, n = 24] as well as patients with Clostridium difficile infection [CDI, n = 8].
RESULTS: In total, 150 miRNAs were significantly detected in faeces from controls and patients, and multivariate analyses showed that CD patients with high disease activities had a distinct miRNA profile and that miR-223 and miR-1246 were distinct from other faecal miRNAs. In a larger cohort, active UC patients displayed significantly higher levels of miR-223 and miR-1246 than controls while patients with CDI had higher levels of faecal miR-1246 but not miR-223. No differences were noted in serum samples.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive screen of faecal miRNAs performed in IBD. Further investigation will aim to confirm these findings in a larger cohort and to understand the biological function and cellular sources of faecal miRNAs.
METHODS: More than 800 different human faecal miRNAs were measured in stool samples from control individuals and patients with active CD by using NanoString technology. Selected miRNAs were quantified by qRT-PCR in faeces, serum and intestinal tissue of controls [n = 23] and patients with inactive or active CD [n = 22, n = 22] or UC [n = 11, n = 24] as well as patients with Clostridium difficile infection [CDI, n = 8].
RESULTS: In total, 150 miRNAs were significantly detected in faeces from controls and patients, and multivariate analyses showed that CD patients with high disease activities had a distinct miRNA profile and that miR-223 and miR-1246 were distinct from other faecal miRNAs. In a larger cohort, active UC patients displayed significantly higher levels of miR-223 and miR-1246 than controls while patients with CDI had higher levels of faecal miR-1246 but not miR-223. No differences were noted in serum samples.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive screen of faecal miRNAs performed in IBD. Further investigation will aim to confirm these findings in a larger cohort and to understand the biological function and cellular sources of faecal miRNAs.