The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2005
A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chambers J, Roxburgh J, Blauth C, O'Riordan J, Hodson F, Rimington H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study compared hemodynamic function and clinical events in consecutive patients randomly assigned to receive a wholly supra-annular replacement valve or a valve with an intra-annular component.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients with an average age of 62 years (range 40-74 years) were sized for both a CarboMedics Top Hat valve (CarboMedics Inc, Austin, Tex) and an MCRI On-X valve (Medical Carbon Research Institute, LLC, Austin, Tex) before random assignment to receive either valve type. Echocardiographic and clinical assessments were performed in the immediate postoperative period and at 1 year.
RESULTS: The mean effective orifice areas were 1.41 +/- 0.42 cm2 for the Top Hat and 2.17 +/- 0.78 cm2 for the On-X (P < .0001). The mean pressure differences were 12.2 +/- 4.4 mm Hg and 6.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, respectively (P < .0001). New York Heart Association functional class was better with the On-X than the Top Hat valves, but there were no differences in clinical events, regression of left ventricular mass, or measures of hemolysis.
CONCLUSION: The partially intra-annular MCRI On-X valve was hemodynamically superior to the wholly supra-annular CarboMedics Top Hat valve. However, there were no differences in early clinical outcomes between the two valve types.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients with an average age of 62 years (range 40-74 years) were sized for both a CarboMedics Top Hat valve (CarboMedics Inc, Austin, Tex) and an MCRI On-X valve (Medical Carbon Research Institute, LLC, Austin, Tex) before random assignment to receive either valve type. Echocardiographic and clinical assessments were performed in the immediate postoperative period and at 1 year.
RESULTS: The mean effective orifice areas were 1.41 +/- 0.42 cm2 for the Top Hat and 2.17 +/- 0.78 cm2 for the On-X (P < .0001). The mean pressure differences were 12.2 +/- 4.4 mm Hg and 6.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, respectively (P < .0001). New York Heart Association functional class was better with the On-X than the Top Hat valves, but there were no differences in clinical events, regression of left ventricular mass, or measures of hemolysis.
CONCLUSION: The partially intra-annular MCRI On-X valve was hemodynamically superior to the wholly supra-annular CarboMedics Top Hat valve. However, there were no differences in early clinical outcomes between the two valve types.