Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2020
Do ICD diagnostics predict failure of ventricular tachycardia response to antitachycardia pacing and need for shock?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Damluji Mohammed S, Singhvi Aditi, Snuckel Meghan, Zaghloul Ahmed, Kluger Jeffrey
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Among heart failure patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) failing antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and terminated by shock renders higher mortality as compared to MMVT terminated by ATP only. It is unknown if the higher mortality in ATP failure reflects decompensated heart failure.
OBJECTIVE: It was the purpose of the present study to determine if ICD heart failure diagnostics can predict the failure of ATP and the need to shock to terminate MMVT.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of 103 consecutive patients with Medtronic ICDs who had MMVT and received ICD therapy. Heart failure diagnostics preceding each MMVT event were reviewed including atrial fibrillation burden, patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, Optivol® fluid index, and MMVT heart rate.
RESULTS: A total of 452 MMVT events were analyzed, of which 23% required shock. Compared to MMVT that responded to ATP, MMVT that failed ATP and required shock had significantly faster heart rates and higher atrial fibrillation burden. Patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, and OptiVol® fluid index were similar between ATP responsive MMVT events and those that failed ATP. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline characteristics, higher atrial fibrillation burden and lower patient activity were associated with ATP failure and shock termination.
CONCLUSION: Device diagnostics associated with decompensated heart failure identified MMVT events that failed ATP and necessitated shock.
OBJECTIVE: It was the purpose of the present study to determine if ICD heart failure diagnostics can predict the failure of ATP and the need to shock to terminate MMVT.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of 103 consecutive patients with Medtronic ICDs who had MMVT and received ICD therapy. Heart failure diagnostics preceding each MMVT event were reviewed including atrial fibrillation burden, patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, Optivol® fluid index, and MMVT heart rate.
RESULTS: A total of 452 MMVT events were analyzed, of which 23% required shock. Compared to MMVT that responded to ATP, MMVT that failed ATP and required shock had significantly faster heart rates and higher atrial fibrillation burden. Patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, and OptiVol® fluid index were similar between ATP responsive MMVT events and those that failed ATP. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline characteristics, higher atrial fibrillation burden and lower patient activity were associated with ATP failure and shock termination.
CONCLUSION: Device diagnostics associated with decompensated heart failure identified MMVT events that failed ATP and necessitated shock.