Kidney international. Supplement · 2003
Advantages of adjusting the initial dose of intravenous calcitriol according to PTH levels.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodríguez-García Minerva, Fernández-Martín José Luis, de Castañeda Jaime Ruiz, Hervás-Sánchez José, Cannata-Andía Jorge Benito, Caldial Study Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To assess the usefulness of starting calcitriol therapy with a dose proportional to the degree of hyperparathyroidism, 141 patients from 28 centers were treated with intravenous calcitriol for 6 months. The aim was to achieve a final PTH between 125 and 250 pg/mL. Patients with serum PTH>250 pg/mL were included in the study and divided into 4 groups according to baseline PTH levels.
METHODS: The study was completed by 100 patients, a third of which were treated strictly according to the protocol, labeled "compliants"; thus, calcitriol was started according to baseline PTH levels. Two thirds of patients, labeled "noncompliants," showed one or more violation in the dosage regimen.
RESULTS: After 2 months of treatment with calcitriol, 59% of the "compliants" and 35% of the "noncompliants" decreased their PTH levels>40% (P = 0.022), 70%, and 49%, respectively after 3 months of treatment. After 3 months of treatment, 67% of the "compliants" reached the target (PTH 125 to 250 pg/mL) in contrast with 23% of the "noncompliants" (P < 0.001). The number of hypercalcemic and hyperphosphatemic episodes was significantly lower in the "compliants" group (P < 0.006).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate several advantages when calcitriol therapy is started with a dose proportional to the severity of hyperparathyroidism.
METHODS: The study was completed by 100 patients, a third of which were treated strictly according to the protocol, labeled "compliants"; thus, calcitriol was started according to baseline PTH levels. Two thirds of patients, labeled "noncompliants," showed one or more violation in the dosage regimen.
RESULTS: After 2 months of treatment with calcitriol, 59% of the "compliants" and 35% of the "noncompliants" decreased their PTH levels>40% (P = 0.022), 70%, and 49%, respectively after 3 months of treatment. After 3 months of treatment, 67% of the "compliants" reached the target (PTH 125 to 250 pg/mL) in contrast with 23% of the "noncompliants" (P < 0.001). The number of hypercalcemic and hyperphosphatemic episodes was significantly lower in the "compliants" group (P < 0.006).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate several advantages when calcitriol therapy is started with a dose proportional to the severity of hyperparathyroidism.