Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2000
The value of external anal sphincter electromyography for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tison F, Arne P, Sourgen C, Chrysostome V, Yeklef F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of external anal sphincter electromyography (ASEMG) for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) among various causes of parkinsonism. ASEMG denervation profiles have previously been proposed as a diagnosis test for MSA, but their specificity is disputed.
METHODS: ASEMG variables of 52 parkinsonian patients were analyzed according to the clinical diagnosis: MSA (n = 31) or no MSA (n = 21). Mean motor unit potential duration, percentage of polyphasicity, and the electromyographer's interpretation were analyzed according to clinical diagnosis, disease duration, genitourinary symptoms, gender, parity, and history of pelvic surgery.
RESULTS: All patients with MSA showed ASEMG denervation. Mean motor unit potential duration was the most discriminant variable. No patient with MSA had a mean duration less than 12 ms and no patient without MSA had one greater than 16 ms. ASEMG discriminates between patients with MSA and Parkinson's disease. Using a threshold of 13 ms, the sensitivity was 80% and specificity was almost 70% (positive predictive value, 80%) for the diagnosis of MSA. Age, history of pelvic surgery, and to a lesser extent, female gender, parity, disease duration, and presence of urinary symptoms increased the likelihood of abnormal ASEMG.
CONCLUSION: ASEMG was highly sensitive and rather specific for the diagnosis of MSA.
METHODS: ASEMG variables of 52 parkinsonian patients were analyzed according to the clinical diagnosis: MSA (n = 31) or no MSA (n = 21). Mean motor unit potential duration, percentage of polyphasicity, and the electromyographer's interpretation were analyzed according to clinical diagnosis, disease duration, genitourinary symptoms, gender, parity, and history of pelvic surgery.
RESULTS: All patients with MSA showed ASEMG denervation. Mean motor unit potential duration was the most discriminant variable. No patient with MSA had a mean duration less than 12 ms and no patient without MSA had one greater than 16 ms. ASEMG discriminates between patients with MSA and Parkinson's disease. Using a threshold of 13 ms, the sensitivity was 80% and specificity was almost 70% (positive predictive value, 80%) for the diagnosis of MSA. Age, history of pelvic surgery, and to a lesser extent, female gender, parity, disease duration, and presence of urinary symptoms increased the likelihood of abnormal ASEMG.
CONCLUSION: ASEMG was highly sensitive and rather specific for the diagnosis of MSA.