Japanese journal of radiology · 2018
Standardization of [F-18]FDG PET/CT for response evaluation by the Radiologic Society of North America-Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (RSNA-QIBA) profile: preliminary results from the Japan-QIBA (J-QIBA) activities for Asian international multicenter phase II trial.
Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bae Hyeyeol, Tsuchiya Junichi, Okamoto Takehito, Ito Ikuko, Sonehara Yusuke, Nagahama Fumiko, Kubota Kazunori, Tateishi Ukihide
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In an Asian international multicenter phase II trial conducted in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), [F-18]FDG-PET/CT was used for evaluation of the therapeutic response. Standardization of the PET/CT scanners was necessary before patient enrollment. We therefore standardized the scanners by phantom tests based on the profile approved by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) of Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The tests were conducted on 12 scanners in 12 facilities in compliance with the QIBA Profile and used National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) body phantoms. We measured three parameters (standardized uptake value [SUV], resolution and noise) and adjusted the imaging parameter values. The indexes recommended in the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM) guideline were also evaluated.
RESULTS: In a total of 12 facilities, 6 facilities required no change in imaging conditions and 6 facilities required changes in imaging parameters. After revision, the three measurements (SUV, resolution and noise) met QIBA criteria at all sites, but 10 of the 12 scanners did not meet JSNM criteria.
CONCLUSION: We standardized imaging conditions using phantoms as required in the RSNA-QIBA profile for response evaluation by [F-18]FDG PET/CT images in a multicenter study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The tests were conducted on 12 scanners in 12 facilities in compliance with the QIBA Profile and used National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) body phantoms. We measured three parameters (standardized uptake value [SUV], resolution and noise) and adjusted the imaging parameter values. The indexes recommended in the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM) guideline were also evaluated.
RESULTS: In a total of 12 facilities, 6 facilities required no change in imaging conditions and 6 facilities required changes in imaging parameters. After revision, the three measurements (SUV, resolution and noise) met QIBA criteria at all sites, but 10 of the 12 scanners did not meet JSNM criteria.
CONCLUSION: We standardized imaging conditions using phantoms as required in the RSNA-QIBA profile for response evaluation by [F-18]FDG PET/CT images in a multicenter study.