MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/wno.0b013e3182224b92

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2011

Use of the Cogan lid twitch to identify myasthenia gravis.

Singman Eric L, Matta Noelle S, Silbert David I

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the reliability of the Cogan lid twitch (CLT) test in a neuro-ophthalmology clinic.

METHODS

CLT testing was performed on adult patients presenting to the neuro-ophthalmology clinic by the neuro-ophthalmologist. The patients were instructed to look straight ahead, up, down, and straight ahead again. The upper eyelids were carefully evaluated immediately following this movement for the presence of a brief upward twitch of the upper eyelid, which would indicate a positive CLT test. The test was repeated as needed. We evaluated the findings from the ophthalmologic examination along with results of available tests, such as serologic findings, MRIs, and CTs.

RESULTS

Of 117 patients evaluated, 24 had myasthenia gravis (MG), and 18 of these patients had a positive lid twitch. Of the 98 patients who did not display a positive Cogan twitch, 6 had MG. We calculated the specificity of the CLT to be 99%, with a sensitivity 75% and false-positive rate 1%.

CONCLUSION

The CLT test is a specific and sensitive test to use in a neuro-ophthalmology clinic to evaluate for MG.

Для цитирования: Singman Eric L, Matta Noelle S, Silbert David I. Use of the Cogan lid twitch to identify myasthenia gravis.. Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/wno.0b013e3182224b92.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.