The Netherlands journal of medicine · 1998
Symptom clusters cannot be used in distinguishing Helicobacter pylori positive or negative patients with functional dyspepsia.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Werdmuller B F, van der Putten A B, Loffeld R J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A retrospective study was done in consecutive patients in order to seek out whether dyspepsia subgroups (reflux-like, ulcer-like, and, dysmotility-like dyspepsia) can be useful in describing Helicobacter pylori positive and negative functional dyspepsia.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included if no macroscopic lesions in oesophagus, stomach or duodenum were seen. Antral biopsy specimens were taken for detection of H. pylori. A validated questionnaire was used.
RESULTS: Six hundred patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three hundred were positive for H. pylori. In the H. pylori positive (HP+) patients only 3 (1.2%) had 'pure' reflux-like dyspepsia, 17 (6.9%) had ulcer-like dyspepsia and 10 (4%) suffered from dysmotility-like dyspepsia. In the H. pylori negative (HP-) patients these figures were 6 (2.3%), 17 (6.6%) and 7 (2.7%), respectively (ns). The majority of patients had a combination of complaints belonging to the three subgroups. Reflux-like dyspepsia was present in 179 (73%) HP+ dyspeptics and 195 (76%) HP-'s (ns). Ulcer-like dyspepsia was present in 213 (88%) HP+ cases and 233 (92%) HP-'s (ns). Dysmotility-like dyspepsia was present in 197 (81%) HP+'s and 212 (82%) HP-'s (ns).
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that it is not possible to identify patients suffering from H. pylori infection on basis of symptom clusters.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included if no macroscopic lesions in oesophagus, stomach or duodenum were seen. Antral biopsy specimens were taken for detection of H. pylori. A validated questionnaire was used.
RESULTS: Six hundred patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three hundred were positive for H. pylori. In the H. pylori positive (HP+) patients only 3 (1.2%) had 'pure' reflux-like dyspepsia, 17 (6.9%) had ulcer-like dyspepsia and 10 (4%) suffered from dysmotility-like dyspepsia. In the H. pylori negative (HP-) patients these figures were 6 (2.3%), 17 (6.6%) and 7 (2.7%), respectively (ns). The majority of patients had a combination of complaints belonging to the three subgroups. Reflux-like dyspepsia was present in 179 (73%) HP+ dyspeptics and 195 (76%) HP-'s (ns). Ulcer-like dyspepsia was present in 213 (88%) HP+ cases and 233 (92%) HP-'s (ns). Dysmotility-like dyspepsia was present in 197 (81%) HP+'s and 212 (82%) HP-'s (ns).
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that it is not possible to identify patients suffering from H. pylori infection on basis of symptom clusters.