MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.008

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of anaesthesia · 2024

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative controlled hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Dauterman Leah, Khan Nabia, Tebbe Connor, Li Jiangqiong, Sun Yanhua, Gunderman David, Liu Ziyue, Adams David C, Sessler Daniel I, Meng Lingzhong

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative controlled hypotension improves surgical field visibility by reducing blood loss (efficacy) but poses potential risks linked to organ hypoperfusion (safety). The use of controlled hypotension persists despite increasing evidence of associations between intraoperative inadvertent hypotension and adverse outcomes. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the focus and results of intraoperative controlled hypertension research differ across anaesthesia and surgery investigators because of differing priorities.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomised trials comparing controlled hypotension with usual care with trials categorised by investigators' affiliation.

RESULTS

We identified 48 eligible trials, of which 37 were conducted by anaesthesia investigators and 11 by surgery investigators. For the primary outcome, 54% of the anaesthesia-led trials focused on safety, whereas all (100%) surgery-led trials focused on efficacy (P=0.004). Compared with usual care, mean arterial pressure in controlled hypotension was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-29%) lower in anaesthesia trials and 30% (95% CI 14-37%) lower in surgery trials; estimated blood loss was 44% (95% CI 30-55%) less in anaesthesia trials and 38% (95% CI 30-49%) less in surgery trials. Overall, blood loss was reduced by 43% (95% CI 32-53%), and trial sequential analysis supported an efficacy conclusion. Mean arterial pressure and estimated blood loss reductions were associated (R2=0.41, P=0.002). All trials were underpowered for safety outcomes, and none adequately evaluated myocardial or renal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaesthesia researchers prioritised safety outcomes, whereas surgery researchers emphasised efficacy in controlled hypotension trials. Controlled hypotension significantly reduces blood loss. In contrast, safety outcomes were poorly studied. Given increasing observational evidence linking inadvertent hypotension to myocardial and renal injury, the safety of controlled hypotension remains to be addressed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023450397).

Для цитирования: Dauterman Leah, Khan Nabia, Tebbe Connor, Li Jiangqiong, Sun Yanhua, Gunderman David, Liu Ziyue, Adams David C, Sessler Daniel I, Meng Lingzhong. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative controlled hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.. British journal of anaesthesia. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.