Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2000
Frequency and significance of antibodies to chromatin in autoimmune hepatitis type I.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li L, Chen M, Huang D Y, Nishioka M
Аннотация
AIMS AND METHODS: To assess the frequency and clinical significance of antibodies to chromatin (ACA) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), 36 Japanese patients with AIH type I were studied for serum reactivity with chromatin by using an ELISA.
RESULTS: Antibodies to chromatin were detected in 19 of 36 patients with AIH type I. There was a significantly higher frequency of ACA in patients with AIH type I than in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C and B (52.8 vs 13.2, 5.4 and 6.7%, respectively; P<0.01). None of the 19 healthy subjects had positive reactions. Sixteen of 19 patients with seropositive sera (44.4%) had reactivities with other nuclear antigens (recombinant nucleoproteins U1RNP-A, U1RNP-70; recombinant ribonucleoprotein complexes SSA/Ro 52K, SSA/Ro 60K; recombinant centromere Cenp-B; dsDNA and histones). Adsorption with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and histones could not remove the majority of antichromatin reactivity as 81.9% of the antibody reactivity still remained. In five sera samples from AIH type I patients positive for anti-dsDNA and antihistones, the antibody activities for dsDNA and histones were inhibited after the absorbtion of sera with chromatin. The patterns of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detected by using indirect immunofluorescence were similar between patients with and without ACA. Patients with ACA had significantly high serum levels of gamma-globulin and immunoglobulin G. The ACA titers dropped significantly after corticosteroid treatment (P< 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to chromatin are frequently present in patients with AIH type I and they are one of the dominant autoantibodies associated with ANA reactivity in AIH type I. Antibodies to chromatin cannot be used to characterize distinct clinical subgroups of AIH type I.
RESULTS: Antibodies to chromatin were detected in 19 of 36 patients with AIH type I. There was a significantly higher frequency of ACA in patients with AIH type I than in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C and B (52.8 vs 13.2, 5.4 and 6.7%, respectively; P<0.01). None of the 19 healthy subjects had positive reactions. Sixteen of 19 patients with seropositive sera (44.4%) had reactivities with other nuclear antigens (recombinant nucleoproteins U1RNP-A, U1RNP-70; recombinant ribonucleoprotein complexes SSA/Ro 52K, SSA/Ro 60K; recombinant centromere Cenp-B; dsDNA and histones). Adsorption with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and histones could not remove the majority of antichromatin reactivity as 81.9% of the antibody reactivity still remained. In five sera samples from AIH type I patients positive for anti-dsDNA and antihistones, the antibody activities for dsDNA and histones were inhibited after the absorbtion of sera with chromatin. The patterns of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detected by using indirect immunofluorescence were similar between patients with and without ACA. Patients with ACA had significantly high serum levels of gamma-globulin and immunoglobulin G. The ACA titers dropped significantly after corticosteroid treatment (P< 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to chromatin are frequently present in patients with AIH type I and they are one of the dominant autoantibodies associated with ANA reactivity in AIH type I. Antibodies to chromatin cannot be used to characterize distinct clinical subgroups of AIH type I.