Cureus · 2025
Bioequivalent Letermovir Usage for Prophylaxis in Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation at High Risk of CMV Reactivation: A Report of Two Cases From India.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nag Arijit, Kt Baalamurugan, Kumar Jeevan, Ghosh Shouriyo, Podder Dibakar, Chattopadhyay Debranjani, Saha Saswata, Javed Rizwan, Chatterji Soumyadip, Rath Asish, Nair Reena, Bharat Suyash
Аннотация
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a major complication in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), increasing nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and transplant-related complications. Letermovir, a CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) terminase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing CMV reactivation without the hematologic toxicity associated with traditional antivirals. We report two HSCT cases, one with a T-cell receptor (TCR) alpha/beta-depleted haploidentical transplant and another haploidentical (6/10 HLA-matched) stem cell transplant, both at significant risk for CMV reactivation. Letermovir prophylaxis was initiated early post-transplant and continued for 100-200 days, depending on risk factors. Both patients remained free of CMV reactivation throughout follow-up (beyond Day +140), with no breakthrough CMV infection or drug-related adverse effects. This case series highlights the first real-world use of letermovir, India's bioequivalent letermovir, in haploidentical transplant recipients, supporting its clinical effectiveness in a resource-limited setting. Real-world outcomes were consistent with previously reported clinical trial data. While outcomes were favorable, the small sample size and single-center experience represent limitations. Nonetheless, the findings highlight the potential benefit of extended prophylaxis beyond Day 100 and the need for individualized CMV prevention strategies in immunosuppressed populations.