Schizophrenia research · 2020
Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in ameliorating negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Lingfang, Fang Xinyu, Chen Yan, Wang Yewei, Wang Dandan, Zhang Chen
Аннотация
AIMS: Negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia patients are associated with the patients' functional outcomes and quality of life. However, pharmacotherapy has little effect on such symptoms. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in ameliorating negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia patients.
METHODS: A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases through March 23, 2020. Studies were included if they met all the following criteria: (1) subjects were exclusively patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or psychosis, (2) active tDCS and shame stimulation were conducted in two parallel groups, (3) sufficient data were present, and (4) the study design was based on a randomized controlled trial. Two authors conducted the search strategy, publication assessment and data extraction independently, and a third person was consulted when any disagreement emerged.
RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included (12 studies included negative symptoms and 7 studies included cognitive impairments). The overall meta-analysis showed no significant difference between active and sham tDCS in ameliorating negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients (SMD: -0.14, 95% CI: -0.33- 0.05). Subgroup analysis including studies with a high stimulation frequency, twice daily, revealed a significant difference in therapeutic effects between active tDCS and sham stimulation (SMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.05). With respect to cognitive impairments, there was a trend indicating that active tDCS might improve cognitive impairment (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.46- 0.04), but the overall meta-analysis failed to obtain statistically significant results.
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicates that tDCS is a potential strategy for improving negative symptoms, but the therapeutic benefit for negative symptoms requires a high stimulation frequency (twice a day).
METHODS: A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases through March 23, 2020. Studies were included if they met all the following criteria: (1) subjects were exclusively patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or psychosis, (2) active tDCS and shame stimulation were conducted in two parallel groups, (3) sufficient data were present, and (4) the study design was based on a randomized controlled trial. Two authors conducted the search strategy, publication assessment and data extraction independently, and a third person was consulted when any disagreement emerged.
RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included (12 studies included negative symptoms and 7 studies included cognitive impairments). The overall meta-analysis showed no significant difference between active and sham tDCS in ameliorating negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients (SMD: -0.14, 95% CI: -0.33- 0.05). Subgroup analysis including studies with a high stimulation frequency, twice daily, revealed a significant difference in therapeutic effects between active tDCS and sham stimulation (SMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.05). With respect to cognitive impairments, there was a trend indicating that active tDCS might improve cognitive impairment (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.46- 0.04), but the overall meta-analysis failed to obtain statistically significant results.
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicates that tDCS is a potential strategy for improving negative symptoms, but the therapeutic benefit for negative symptoms requires a high stimulation frequency (twice a day).