General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022
Surgical outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection based on surgeon experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hattori Shigeru, Noguchi Kenichiro, Gunji Yusuke, Nagatsuka Motoki, Kagaya Hideo, Katayama Ikuo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate our surgical strategy for acute aortic dissection Stanford A and determine whether it is safe regardless of the experience of the primary surgeon.
METHODS: Between April 2015 and September 2020, a total of 160 patients who underwent open surgery for type A aortic dissection at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital were reviewed. Data were collected from reviews of computerized medical records. From this study cohort, we retrospectively reviewed the cases of trainee (group T) and experienced primary surgeons (group E). We evaluated rates of 30 day and in-hospital mortality, stroke, aortic reintervention, and mid-term survival for both groups.
RESULTS: The rates of 30 day and in-hospital mortalities in group T were 5.1 and 7.7%, respectively, whereas those in group E were 4.7 and 4.7%, respectively. One and 3 year survival rates in group T were 88.4 and 87.1% and in group E were 95.3 and 95.3%, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.11). The 1 year and 3 year rates of freedom from reintervention were 90.9 and 72.8% in group T and 96.8 and 92.7% in group E, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.29). The permanent neurological dysfunction rate was 8.1% overall, 8.5% in group T, and 7.0% in group E, with no significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical strategy for acute type A aortic dissection is safe and appropriate regardless of the experience of the primary surgeon.
METHODS: Between April 2015 and September 2020, a total of 160 patients who underwent open surgery for type A aortic dissection at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital were reviewed. Data were collected from reviews of computerized medical records. From this study cohort, we retrospectively reviewed the cases of trainee (group T) and experienced primary surgeons (group E). We evaluated rates of 30 day and in-hospital mortality, stroke, aortic reintervention, and mid-term survival for both groups.
RESULTS: The rates of 30 day and in-hospital mortalities in group T were 5.1 and 7.7%, respectively, whereas those in group E were 4.7 and 4.7%, respectively. One and 3 year survival rates in group T were 88.4 and 87.1% and in group E were 95.3 and 95.3%, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.11). The 1 year and 3 year rates of freedom from reintervention were 90.9 and 72.8% in group T and 96.8 and 92.7% in group E, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.29). The permanent neurological dysfunction rate was 8.1% overall, 8.5% in group T, and 7.0% in group E, with no significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical strategy for acute type A aortic dissection is safe and appropriate regardless of the experience of the primary surgeon.