European journal of neurology · 2021
Aspirin, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and caffeine for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Diener Hans Christoph, Gaul Charly, Lehmacher Walter, Weiser Thomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many migraine patients rely on over-the-counter analgesics for the treatment of migraine attacks. Fixed-dose combinations of aspirin, paracetamol and caffeine (APC) have been used for treating migraine in many countries for a long time. We performed a meta-analysis for the comparison of APC versus placebo, which has not been done to date.
METHODS: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies using APC to treat a migraine attack were included in a meta-analysis. We calculated the rate ratio (RRs) associated with APC versus placebo.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included, with 3306 participants (2147 treated with APC and 1159 treated with placebo). For the primary efficacy outcome, being pain-free at 2 h, APC was superior to placebo (19.6% vs. 9.0%, RR 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-3.3). For the co-primary efficacy outcome, pain relief at 2 h, APC was superior to placebo (54.3% vs. 31.2%, RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9). Adverse events were more frequent in the APC than the placebo groups (10.9% vs. 7.8%, RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that APC is superior to placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Efficacy, measured by pain-free response and pain relief at 2 h, was clinically relevant.
METHODS: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies using APC to treat a migraine attack were included in a meta-analysis. We calculated the rate ratio (RRs) associated with APC versus placebo.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included, with 3306 participants (2147 treated with APC and 1159 treated with placebo). For the primary efficacy outcome, being pain-free at 2 h, APC was superior to placebo (19.6% vs. 9.0%, RR 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-3.3). For the co-primary efficacy outcome, pain relief at 2 h, APC was superior to placebo (54.3% vs. 31.2%, RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9). Adverse events were more frequent in the APC than the placebo groups (10.9% vs. 7.8%, RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that APC is superior to placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Efficacy, measured by pain-free response and pain relief at 2 h, was clinically relevant.