Khirurgiia · 2021
[Hemorrhoidal artery ligation without Doppler navigation in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease].
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Оригинал на русском
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Popovtsev M A, Alekberzade A V, Krylov N N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate and long-term results of surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease (GD) stage II-III using two methods of identification of hemorrhoidal arteries (HA) with their subsequent ligation and mucopexy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of HA ligation with and without Doppler navigation. The study included 120 patients: group A - Doppler-guided ligation (n=60) and group B - ligation without ultrasound (n=60).
RESULTS: GD stage II was found in 27 patients of the group A and 30 patients of the group B (p=0.4). Mean number of ligated HA in the group A was 3.36, in the group B - 2.83 (p=0.062). Mean number of mucopexy was 3.2 and 3.5, respectively (p=0.8). Mean follow-up period was 8.3±2.1 and 8.1±1.9 months, respectively (p=0.96). Relapse of all preoperative symptoms was registered in 1 patient (1.6%) in the group A. Intermittent bleeding was observed in 5 (8.3%) and 3 (5%) patients, respectively (p=0.71). Periodic hemorrhoid prolapse (GP) occurred in 6 (10%) and 4 (6.6%) respondents, respectively (p=0.74). VAS score of pain syndrome after 2 months and later was 0 - 1 points (p=1.0). Most of patients in both groups (group A - 89%, group B - 94%; p=0.7) noted that surgery did not disrupt their usual lifestyle and relieved from symptoms of GD.
CONCLUSION: There are no significant advantages of Doppler-guided HA ligation compared to palpation regarding incidence of hemorrhoid prolapse (p=0.74) and hemorrhoidal bleeding (p=0.71). Pain syndrome (p=0.24), incidence of postoperative complications (p=0.51) and relapses (p=0.31) showed comparable safety of both techniques.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of HA ligation with and without Doppler navigation. The study included 120 patients: group A - Doppler-guided ligation (n=60) and group B - ligation without ultrasound (n=60).
RESULTS: GD stage II was found in 27 patients of the group A and 30 patients of the group B (p=0.4). Mean number of ligated HA in the group A was 3.36, in the group B - 2.83 (p=0.062). Mean number of mucopexy was 3.2 and 3.5, respectively (p=0.8). Mean follow-up period was 8.3±2.1 and 8.1±1.9 months, respectively (p=0.96). Relapse of all preoperative symptoms was registered in 1 patient (1.6%) in the group A. Intermittent bleeding was observed in 5 (8.3%) and 3 (5%) patients, respectively (p=0.71). Periodic hemorrhoid prolapse (GP) occurred in 6 (10%) and 4 (6.6%) respondents, respectively (p=0.74). VAS score of pain syndrome after 2 months and later was 0 - 1 points (p=1.0). Most of patients in both groups (group A - 89%, group B - 94%; p=0.7) noted that surgery did not disrupt their usual lifestyle and relieved from symptoms of GD.
CONCLUSION: There are no significant advantages of Doppler-guided HA ligation compared to palpation regarding incidence of hemorrhoid prolapse (p=0.74) and hemorrhoidal bleeding (p=0.71). Pain syndrome (p=0.24), incidence of postoperative complications (p=0.51) and relapses (p=0.31) showed comparable safety of both techniques.