Prenatal diagnosis · 2021
Perinatal outcomes after selective feticide via umbilical cord occlusion in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Tianchen, Chen Ziyi, Yin Xiaohan, Shi Huifeng, Niu Jieqiong, Xie Jialei, Wei Yuan, Wang Xiaoli
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare perinatal outcomes between umbilical cord occlusion techniques in monochorionic pregnancies, including umbilical cord ligation, fetoscopic laser coagulation, interstitial laser coagulation, bipolar cord occlusion, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation.
METHODS: This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020158861). PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for studies published up to May 2020. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the outcomes among the six techniques. Meta-regression was used to adjust for confounders.
RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with 1646 participants were included. The overall survival was 76.5% after umbilical cord ligation, 78.8% after fetoscopic laser coagulation, 60.3% after interstitial laser coagulation, 79.2% after bipolar cord occlusion, 77.5% after radiofrequency ablation, and 75.0% after microwave ablation. Subgroup comparison showed the rates of overall survival and preterm premature rupture of membranes were not significant different among six techniques. However, rates of fetal loss, premature birth, live birth, and neonatal death differed significantly among the six groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of umbilical cord occlusion techniques will affect perinatal outcomes. We suggested that the choice of umbilical cord occlusion techniques should fully consider these differences among techniques.
METHODS: This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020158861). PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for studies published up to May 2020. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the outcomes among the six techniques. Meta-regression was used to adjust for confounders.
RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with 1646 participants were included. The overall survival was 76.5% after umbilical cord ligation, 78.8% after fetoscopic laser coagulation, 60.3% after interstitial laser coagulation, 79.2% after bipolar cord occlusion, 77.5% after radiofrequency ablation, and 75.0% after microwave ablation. Subgroup comparison showed the rates of overall survival and preterm premature rupture of membranes were not significant different among six techniques. However, rates of fetal loss, premature birth, live birth, and neonatal death differed significantly among the six groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of umbilical cord occlusion techniques will affect perinatal outcomes. We suggested that the choice of umbilical cord occlusion techniques should fully consider these differences among techniques.