MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.18416

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2021

Laparoscopic Excision of Patent Processus Vaginalis for Pediatric Hydroceles.

Banieghbal Behrouz

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background The standard surgical practice for pediatric hydrocele is resection and ligation of the patent processus vaginalis (PPV). Non-ligation of PPV for pediatric hydrocele is another possibility that can be repaired laparoscopically. Material & methods A retrospective study was undertaken over 10 years (Jan 2011-Feb 2020), of a case series of boys with hydroceles that underwent laparoscopic PPV (Lap PPV) excision. Exclusion criteria were for parents who requested open surgery (10 cases) or an omental plug noted at the PPV site during laparoscopy (one case). Laparoscopic PPV excision was performed via a transperitoneal approach. Results There were 43 cases of Lap PP excision, including three recurrences after open surgery. There were no conversions, complications, or recurrences in any patients. The average operative time for unilateral cases was 21 mins (range 15-30 mins). Three concurrent contra-lateral hydroceles were noted and resected during the primary procedure. Time to regular activity was within one day. There was no visible scar or recurrence after Lap PPV at six months post-surgery review. Conclusion Lap PPV excision appears to be at least equivalent to the "open and ligation" approach. During laparoscopy, both internal rings are assessed for a PPV. By avoiding an inguinal incision(s), a better cosmetic result is possible. It is conceivably safer than open surgery in recurrent cases.

Для цитирования: Banieghbal Behrouz. Laparoscopic Excision of Patent Processus Vaginalis for Pediatric Hydroceles.. Cureus. 2021. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18416.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.