Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2007
The median palmar cutaneous nerve in normal subjects and CTS.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rathakrishnan Rahul, Therimadasamy Aravinda Kannan, Chan Y H, Wilder-Smith E P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The neurophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) relies on detecting abnormal median nerve transcarpal conduction in the presence of unaffected comparator nerves. We compare the palmar cutaneous median branch (PCBm) with the ulnar sensory nerve conduction to digit 5 (US(5)) as comparator nerves for diagnosing CTS.
METHODS: In a prospective case control study of patients with clinically defined carpal tunnel syndrome and normal subjects, we determined and compared the PCBm and US(5) conduction velocity.
RESULTS: We examined 57 hands with clinically defined CTS and 59 control hands. Comparison showed highly significantly slowed PCBm conduction (p<0.0001) but not for US(5) conduction (p=0.488). Using a 3 percentile cut-off for abnormality derived from controls, PCBm conduction velocity was abnormal in 46% of CTS hands.
CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of PCBm nerve conduction abnormality in CTS suggests that this nerve should not be used as a comparator nerve for the neurophysiological diagnosis of CTS. This finding may help explain some of the extension of sensory symptoms outside the median nerve distribution in CTS.
SIGNIFICANCE: In CTS frequent abnormality of PCBm conduction makes this a poor comparator nerve and may explain extension of sensory symptoms beyond the median nerve.
METHODS: In a prospective case control study of patients with clinically defined carpal tunnel syndrome and normal subjects, we determined and compared the PCBm and US(5) conduction velocity.
RESULTS: We examined 57 hands with clinically defined CTS and 59 control hands. Comparison showed highly significantly slowed PCBm conduction (p<0.0001) but not for US(5) conduction (p=0.488). Using a 3 percentile cut-off for abnormality derived from controls, PCBm conduction velocity was abnormal in 46% of CTS hands.
CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of PCBm nerve conduction abnormality in CTS suggests that this nerve should not be used as a comparator nerve for the neurophysiological diagnosis of CTS. This finding may help explain some of the extension of sensory symptoms outside the median nerve distribution in CTS.
SIGNIFICANCE: In CTS frequent abnormality of PCBm conduction makes this a poor comparator nerve and may explain extension of sensory symptoms beyond the median nerve.